Anesthesiologists' preferences for preoperative cardiac evaluation before vascular surgery: results of a mail survey
- PMID: 20868959
- PMCID: PMC4003561
- DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2009.10.017
Anesthesiologists' preferences for preoperative cardiac evaluation before vascular surgery: results of a mail survey
Abstract
Study objective: To investigate whether anesthesiologists' decisions to request preoperative cardiac evaluation (cardiologist consultation, echocardiography, and cardiac stress testing) before vascular surgery were influenced by patient comorbidity and magnitude of surgery; and to explore whether factors unrelated to the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association (ACC/AHA) guidelines influence these decisions.
Design: Survey instrument.
Setting: University medical center.
Subjects: 2,000 U.S. anesthesiologists who were mailed a survey.
Measurements: Six factors in a hypothetical patient presenting for vascular surgery [gender, race (white vs. black), age (65 yrs vs. 85 yrs), comorbidities (sick vs. healthy), functional status, and magnitude of surgical stress] were evaluated. Respondents were asked about their demographics, practice patterns, and how they would manage the hypothetical patient.
Main results: Of 2,000 mailed surveys, 439 U.S. anesthesiologists responded (22%). Multivariate ordinal logistic regression analysis showed that anesthesiologists were more likely to recommend preoperative cardiology consultation for patients with more comorbidities [odds ratio = 5.53; 95% confidence interval (CI) = 3.76, 8.15], for those with poorer functional status (odds ratio = 1.45; 95% CI = 1.02, 2.07), for those undergoing a more significant surgery (odds ratio = 1.61; 95% CI = 1.13, 2.30), as the clinicians' estimated risk of perioperative myocardial infarction increased (P < 0.001), or if they only infrequently anesthetized patients such as the one described in the scenario (P = 0.05). They also would request a preoperative echocardiogram for patients with more comorbidities (odds ratio = 2.58; 95% CI = 1.80, 3.68) and for those undergoing a more significant surgery (odds ratio = 1.59; 95% CI = 1.12, 2.25). A preoperative stress test was recommended for patients with more comorbidities (odds ratio = 3.01; 95% CI = 2.06, 4.38) and for those with a more significant surgery (odds ratio = 1.74; 95% CI = 1.15, 2.63). Other factors associated with request for a preoperative stress test were female gender of the anesthesiologist (odds ratio = 1.79; 95% CI = 1.11, 2.87), those with less experience with such patients (P = 0.05), and those from New England (odds ratio = 2.16; 95% CI = 1.01, 4.62).
Conclusions: Anesthesiologists' preferences for preoperative cardiac evaluation are generally consistent with evidence-based and expert-based AHA/ACC guidelines. However, other physician factors (ie, gender, years in practice, and familiarity with the surgical procedure) also influenced these decisions.
Copyright © 2010 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Similar articles
-
The value of preoperative pharmacologic stress testing before vascular surgery using ACC/AHA guidelines: a prospective, randomized trial.J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2003 Dec;17(6):694-8. doi: 10.1053/j.jvca.2003.09.004. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2003. PMID: 14689407 Clinical Trial.
-
Predictors of perioperative beta-blockade use in vascular surgery: a mail survey of United States anesthesiologists.J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2007 Jun;21(3):330-6. doi: 10.1053/j.jvca.2007.03.007. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2007. PMID: 17544882
-
Perioperative cardiac evaluation of simulated patients by practicing anesthesiologists is not consistent with 2007 ACC/AHA guidelines.J Clin Anesth. 2012 Sep;24(6):446-55. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2011.11.007. Epub 2012 Jun 1. J Clin Anesth. 2012. PMID: 22658810 Clinical Trial.
-
Preoperative cardiac risk assessment.Am Fam Physician. 2002 Nov 15;66(10):1889-96. Am Fam Physician. 2002. PMID: 12469963 Review.
-
New developments in the preoperative evaluation and perioperative management of coronary artery disease in patients undergoing vascular surgery.J Vasc Surg. 2010 Jan;51(1):242-51. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2009.08.087. Epub 2009 Dec 2. J Vasc Surg. 2010. PMID: 19954922 Review.
References
-
- Mangano DT. Perioperative cardiac morbidity. Anesthesiology. 1990;72:153–184. - PubMed
-
- McFalls EO, Ward HB, Moritz TE, et al. Coronary-artery revascularization before elective major vascular surgery. N Engl J Med. 2004;351:2795–2804. - PubMed
-
- Eagle KA, Berger PB, Calkins H, et al. American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Committee to Update the 1996 Guidelines on Perioperative Cardiovascular Evaluation for Noncardiac Surgery). ACC/AHA guideline update for perioperative cardiovascular evaluation for noncardiac surgery—executive summary a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Committee to Update the 1996 Guidelines on Perioperative Cardiovascular Evaluation for Noncardiac Surgery) Circulation. 2002;105:1257–1267. - PubMed
-
- Fleisher LA, Beckman JA, Brown KA, et al. American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Writing Committee to Revise the 2002 Guidelines on Perioperative Cardiovascular Evaluation for Noncardiac Surgery); American Society of Echocardiography; American Society of Nuclear Cardiology; Heart Rhythm Society; Society of Cardiovascular Anesthesiologists; Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions; Society for Vascular Medicine and Biology; Society for Vascular Surgery. ACC/AHA 2007 guidelines on perioperative cardiovascular evaluation and care for noncardiac surgery: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Writing Committee to Revise the 2002 Guidelines on Perioperative Cardiovascular Evaluation for Noncardiac Surgery): developed in collaboration with the American Society of Echocardiography, American Society of Nuclear Cardiology, Heart Rhythm Society, Society of Cardiovascular Anesthesiologists, Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, Society for Vascular Medicine and Biology, and Society for Vascular Surgery. Circulation. 2007;116:e418–e499. - PubMed
-
- Heskestad B, Baardsen R, Helseth E, Ingebrigtsen T. Guideline compliance in management of minimal, mild, and moderate head injury: high frequency of noncompliance among individual physicians despite strong guideline support from clinical leaders. J Trauma. 2008;65:1309–1313. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources