Young-Burgess classification of pelvic ring fractures: does it predict mortality, transfusion requirements, and non-orthopaedic injuries?
- PMID: 20871246
- DOI: 10.1097/BOT.0b013e3181d3cb6b
Young-Burgess classification of pelvic ring fractures: does it predict mortality, transfusion requirements, and non-orthopaedic injuries?
Abstract
Objectives: The objectives of this study were to evaluate the ability of the Young-Burgess classification system to predict mortality, transfusion requirements, and nonorthopaedic injuries in patients with pelvic ring fractures and to determine whether mortality rates after pelvic fractures have changed over time.
Design: Retrospective review.
Setting: Level I trauma center.
Patients: One thousand two hundred forty-eight patients with pelvic fractures during a 7-year period.
Intervention: None.
Main outcome measurements: Mortality at index admission, transfusion requirement during first 24 hours, and presence of nonorthopaedic injuries as a function of Young-Burgess pelvic classification type. Mortality compared with historic controls.
Results: Despite a relatively large sample size, the ability of the Young-Burgess system to predict mortality only approached statistical significance (P = 0.07, Kruskal-Wallis). The Young-Burgess system differentiated transfusion requirements--lateral compression Type 3 (LC3) and anteroposterior compression Types 2 (APC2) and 3 (APC3) fractures had higher transfusion requirements than did lateral compression Type 1 (LC1), anteroposterior compression Type 1 (APC1), and vertical shear (VS) (P < 0.05)--but was not as useful at predicting head, chest, or abdomen injuries. Dividing fractures into stable and unstable types allowed the system to predict mortality rates, abdomen injury rates, and transfusion requirements. Overall mortality in the study group was 9.1%, unchanged from original Young-Burgess studies 15 years previously (P = 0.3).
Conclusions: The Young-Burgess system is useful for predicting transfusion requirements. For the system to predict mortality or nonorthopaedic injuries, fractures must be divided into stable (APC1, LC1) and unstable (APC2, APC3, LC2, LC3, VS, combined mechanism of injury) types. LC1 injuries are very common and not always benign (overall mortality rate, 8.2%).
Comment in
-
Invited commentary: Young-Burgess classification of pelvic ring fractures: does it predict mortality, transfusion requirements, and non-orthopaedic injuries?J Orthop Trauma. 2010 Oct;24(10):609. doi: 10.1097/01.bot.0000389016.21888.f4. J Orthop Trauma. 2010. PMID: 20871247 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
Invited commentary: Young-Burgess classification of pelvic ring fractures: does it predict mortality, transfusion requirements, and non-orthopaedic injuries?J Orthop Trauma. 2010 Oct;24(10):609. doi: 10.1097/01.bot.0000389016.21888.f4. J Orthop Trauma. 2010. PMID: 20871247 No abstract available.
-
Comparing the predictive value of the pelvic ring injury classification systems by Tile and by Young and Burgess.Injury. 2014 Apr;45(4):742-7. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2013.12.003. Epub 2013 Dec 8. Injury. 2014. PMID: 24360744
-
What constitutes a Young and Burgess lateral compression-I (OTA 61-B2) pelvic ring disruption? A description of computed tomography-based fracture anatomy and associated injuries.J Orthop Trauma. 2009 Jan;23(1):16-21. doi: 10.1097/BOT.0b013e31818f8a81. J Orthop Trauma. 2009. PMID: 19104299
-
Predicting blood loss in isolated pelvic and acetabular high-energy trauma.J Orthop Trauma. 2007 Oct;21(9):603-7. doi: 10.1097/BOT.0b013e3181599c27. J Orthop Trauma. 2007. PMID: 17921834 Review.
-
Pelvic fractures: experience of pelvic ring fractures at a major trauma centre.Clin Radiol. 2019 Aug;74(8):649.e19-649.e26. doi: 10.1016/j.crad.2019.04.020. Epub 2019 May 29. Clin Radiol. 2019. PMID: 31153596 Review.
Cited by
-
Pelvic injury prognosis is more closely related to vascular injury severity than anatomical fracture complexity: the WSES classification for pelvic trauma makes sense.World J Emerg Surg. 2020 Aug 17;15(1):48. doi: 10.1186/s13017-020-00328-x. World J Emerg Surg. 2020. PMID: 32807185 Free PMC article.
-
The False Security of Pelvic Binders: 2 Cases of Missed Injuries due to Anatomical Reduction.J Orthop Case Rep. 2016 Jan-Mar;6(1):44-7. doi: 10.13107/jocr.2250-0685.374. J Orthop Case Rep. 2016. PMID: 27299125 Free PMC article.
-
Comparison of the AO/OTA 1996/2007 and 2018 pelvic ring fracture classifications.Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2024 Oct;144(10):4587-4593. doi: 10.1007/s00402-024-05557-2. Epub 2024 Oct 9. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2024. PMID: 39384630 Free PMC article.
-
Comparison of One-Year Functional Outcomes and Quality of Life between Posterior Pelvic Ring Fixation and Combined Anterior-Posterior Pelvic Ring Fixation after Lateral Compression (B2 Type) Pelvic Fracture.Medicina (Kaunas). 2021 Feb 26;57(3):204. doi: 10.3390/medicina57030204. Medicina (Kaunas). 2021. PMID: 33652683 Free PMC article.
-
Nonoperative management of minimally displaced lateral compression type 1 (LC1) injuries with comminuted rami fractures is associated with late displacement.Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2024 Oct;34(7):3491-3497. doi: 10.1007/s00590-023-03646-3. Epub 2023 Aug 5. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2024. PMID: 37542555
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous