Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2011 Feb;469(2):362-71.
doi: 10.1007/s11999-010-1559-2.

What factors influence long-term survivorship after hip arthroscopy?

Affiliations

What factors influence long-term survivorship after hip arthroscopy?

Joseph C McCarthy et al. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2011 Feb.

Abstract

Background: Hip arthroscopy is an evolving procedure. One small study suggested that a low modified Harris hip score and arthritis at the time of surgery were predictors of poor prognosis.

Questions/purposes: We therefore intended to confirm those findings with a large patient cohort to (1) determine the long-term nonarthritic hip score; (2) determine survivorship; (3) identify risk factors that increase the likelihood of THA; and (4) use those factors to create a usable risk assessment algorithm.

Patients and methods: We retrospectively reviewed 324 patients (340 hips) who underwent arthroscopy for pain and/or catching. Of these, 106 patients (111 hips or 33%) had a minimum followup of 10 years (mean, 13 years; range, 10-20 years). The average age was 39 years (± 13) with 47 men and 59 women. We recorded patient age, gender, acetabular and femoral Outerbridge grade at surgery, and the presence of a labral tear. Followup consisted of a nonarthritic hip score or the date of a subsequent THA. We determined survivorship with the end point of THA for the acetabular and femoral Outerbridge grades.

Results: Overall survivorship among the 111 hips was 63% at 10 years. The average nonarthritic hip score for non-THA patients was 87.3 (± 12.1). Survivorship was greater for acetabular and femoral Outerbridge grades normal through II. Age at arthroscopy and Outerbridge grades independently predicted eventual THA. Gender and the presence of a labral tear did not influence long-term survivorship.

Conclusions: The long-term survivorship of labral tears with low-grade cartilage damage indicates hip arthroscopy is reasonable for treating labral tears.

Level of evidence: Level IV, therapeutic study. See Guidelines for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
The Kaplan-Meier estimated survivorship for the subset (n = 111) of the entire cohort (324) using THA as an end point was 91% (86%–96%) at 1 year, 75% (68%–82%) at 5 years, and 63% (55%–71%) at 10 years. Numbers in parentheses at the bottom are patients who did not have THA and were still being followed.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
The Kaplan-Meier estimated survivorship for the followup cohort divided into low-grade (n = 79, 20 THAs) and high-grade (n = 32, 29 THAs) groups based on acetabular Outerbridge grade using THA as an end point showed a decrease in 10-year survivorship for the high grades (22% [9%–35%]) compared with the low grades (80% [71%–89%], p < 0.001, log-rank test = 59.75).
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
The Kaplan-Meier estimated survivorship for the followup cohort divided into low-grade (n = 84, 23 THAs) and high-grade (n = 27, 26 THAs) groups based on femoral Outerbridge grade using THA as an end point showed a decrease in 10-year survivorship for the high grades (12% [2%–22%]) compared with the low grades (80% [72%–88%], p < 0.001, log-rank test = 72.72).
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
The Kaplan-Meier estimated survivorship for a subgroup of the followup cohort, which had a labral tear and a low Outerbridge grade (normal to Grade II) on both the femoral and acetabular side using THA as an end point showed a 90% (80%–100%) survivorship at 5 and 10 years postoperatively. Numbers in parentheses at the bottom are patients who did not have THA and were still being followed.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Awan N, Murray P. Role of hip arthroscopy in the diagnosis and treatment of hip joint pathology. Arthroscopy. 2006;22:215–218. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2005.12.005. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Boyer T, Dorfmann H. Arthroscopy in primary synovial chondromatosis of the hip: description and outcome of treatment. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2008;90:314–318. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.90B3.19664. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Brunner A, Horisberger M, Herzog RF. Sports and recreation activity of patients with femoroacetabular impingement before and after arthroscopic osteoplasty. Am J Sports Med. 2009;37:917–922. doi: 10.1177/0363546508330144. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Byrd JW, Jones KS. Prospective analysis of hip arthroscopy with 10-year followup. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2010;468:741–746. doi: 10.1007/s11999-009-0841-7. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Christensen CP, Althausen PL, Mittleman MA, Lee JA, McCarthy JC. The nonarthritic hip score: reliable and validated. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2003;406:75–83. doi: 10.1097/00003086-200301000-00013. - DOI - PubMed

MeSH terms