Gustofacial and olfactofacial responses in human adults
- PMID: 20876392
- DOI: 10.1093/chemse/bjq092
Gustofacial and olfactofacial responses in human adults
Abstract
Adults' facial reactions in response to tastes and odors were investigated in order to determine whether differential facial displays observed in newborns remain stable in adults who exhibit a greater voluntary facial control. Twenty-eight healthy nonsmokers (14 females) tasted solutions of PROP (bitter), NaCl (salty), citric acid (sour), sucrose (sweet), and glutamate (umami) differing in concentration (low, medium, and high) and smelled different odors (banana, cinnamon, clove, coffee, fish, and garlic). Their facial reactions were video recorded and analyzed using the Facial Action Coding System. Adults' facial reactions discriminated between stimuli with opponent valences. Unpleasant tastes and odors elicited negative displays (brow lower, upper lip raise, and lip corner depress). The pleasant sweet taste elicited positive displays (lip suck), whereas the pleasant odors did not. Unlike newborns, adults smiled with higher concentrations of some unpleasant tastes that can be regarded as serving communicative functions. Moreover, adults expressed negative displays with higher sweetness. Except for the "social" smile in response to unpleasant tastes, adults' facial reactions elicited by tastes and odors mostly correspond to those found in newborns. In conclusion, adults' facial reactions to tastes and odors appear to remain stable in their basic displays; however, some additional reactions might reflect socialization influences.
Similar articles
-
Differential facial responses to four basic tastes in newborns.Child Dev. 1988 Dec;59(6):1555-68. Child Dev. 1988. PMID: 3208567
-
[Assessment of taste development in 62 newborn infants].Zhonghua Er Ke Za Zhi. 2006 May;44(5):350-5. Zhonghua Er Ke Za Zhi. 2006. PMID: 16780712 Chinese.
-
Facial and affective reactions to tastes and their modulation by sadness and joy.Physiol Behav. 2006 Sep 30;89(2):261-9. doi: 10.1016/j.physbeh.2006.06.002. Epub 2006 Jul 20. Physiol Behav. 2006. PMID: 16857218
-
[Methods of taste sensitivity examination].Wiad Lek. 2008;61(7-9):207-10. Wiad Lek. 2008. PMID: 19172833 Review. Polish.
-
[Gustatory perceptions in children].Arch Pediatr. 2005 May;12(5):579-84. doi: 10.1016/j.arcped.2005.01.027. Arch Pediatr. 2005. PMID: 15885551 Review. French.
Cited by
-
The Relationship between Infant Facial Expressions and Food Acceptance.Curr Nutr Rep. 2017 Jun;6(2):141-147. doi: 10.1007/s13668-017-0205-y. Epub 2017 Apr 29. Curr Nutr Rep. 2017. PMID: 28674639 Free PMC article.
-
Facial EMG Activity Is Associated with Hedonic Experiences but not Nutritional Values While Viewing Food Images.Nutrients. 2020 Dec 22;13(1):11. doi: 10.3390/nu13010011. Nutrients. 2020. PMID: 33375209 Free PMC article.
-
Facial EMG Correlates of Subjective Hedonic Responses During Food Consumption.Nutrients. 2020 Apr 22;12(4):1174. doi: 10.3390/nu12041174. Nutrients. 2020. PMID: 32331423 Free PMC article.
-
Brow and Masticatory Muscle Activity Senses Subjective Hedonic Experiences during Food Consumption.Nutrients. 2021 Nov 24;13(12):4216. doi: 10.3390/nu13124216. Nutrients. 2021. PMID: 34959773 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
What is the link between personality and food behavior?Curr Res Food Sci. 2021 Dec 8;5:19-27. doi: 10.1016/j.crfs.2021.12.001. eCollection 2022. Curr Res Food Sci. 2021. PMID: 34917953 Free PMC article. Review.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources