Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2010 Sep 27;170(17):1525-32.
doi: 10.1001/archinternmed.2010.317.

Incidental findings in imaging research: evaluating incidence, benefit, and burden

Affiliations

Incidental findings in imaging research: evaluating incidence, benefit, and burden

Nicholas M Orme et al. Arch Intern Med. .

Abstract

Background: Little information exists concerning the frequency and medical significance of incidental findings (IFs) in imaging research.

Methods: Medical records of research participants undergoing a research imaging examination interpreted by a radiologist during January through March 2004 were reviewed, with 3-year clinical follow-up. An expert panel reviewed all IFs generating clinical action to determine medical benefit/burden on the basis of predefined criteria. The frequency of IFs that generated further clinical action was estimated by modality, body part, age, and sex, along with net medical benefit or burden.

Results: Of 1426 research imaging examinations, 567 (39.8%) had at least 1 IF (1055 total). Risk of an IF increased significantly by age (odds ratio [OR], 1.5; 95% confidence interval, 1.4-1.7 per decade increase). Abdominopelvic computed tomography generated more IFs than other examinations (OR, 18.9 vs ultrasonography; 9.2% with subsequent clinical action), with computed tomography of the thorax and magnetic resonance imaging of the head next (OR, 11.9 and 5.9; 2.8% and 2.2% with action, respectively). Of the 567 examinations with an IF, 35 (6.2%) generated clinical action, resulting in clear medical benefit in 1.1% (6 of 567) and clear medical burden in 0.5% (3 of 567). Medical benefit/burden was usually unclear (26 of 567 [4.6%]).

Conclusions: Frequency of IFs in imaging research examinations varies significantly by imaging modality, body region, and age. Research imaging studies at high risk for generating IFs can be identified. Routine evaluation of research images by radiologists may result in identification of IFs in a high number of cases and subsequent clinical action to address them in a small but significant minority. Such clinical action can result in medical benefit to a small number of patients.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Flow chart detailing exclusion of imaging exams from the final study group of 1426 research imaging exams.
Figure 2
Figure 2
From an 85-year-old female participating in a research study investigating osteoporosis in post-menopausal women. Transverse image of a CT of the abdomen/pelvis without contrast incidentally reveals a heterogenous lesion arising from the posterior aspect of the left kidney worrisome for renal cell carcinoma. The subject underwent CT guided radiofrequency ablation, and during the 3 years since the procedure, there have been no signs of recurrence.
Figure 3
Figure 3
From a 31-year-old female participating in a research study investigating cognitive behavioral therapy in patients with obsessive-compulsive disorder. Sagittal T1 weighted image incidentally demonstrates a partially cystic, partially enhancing mass situated in the posterior aspect of the left parietal lobe involving the cortex and subcortex. The subject underwent stereotactic surgical resection of the mass which was found at pathology to be a grade 2 ependymoma. During the 3 years following surgery, there have been no signs of recurrence.
Figure 4
Figure 4
From a 56-year-old female participating in a research study investigating the use of CT in the detection of high grade esophageal/gastric varices in patients with portal hypertension. Transverse image of a contrast enhanced CT of the abdomen/pelvis incidentally demonstrating multiple abnormal peritoneal and mesenteric nodules that are highly suspicious for metastatic disease. The subject underwent laparoscopy with surgical biopsy of several of the nodules that revealed benign hyperplastic reactive lymph nodes. No further action was taken.

Comment in

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Wolf SM, Lawrenz FP, Nelson CA, et al. Managing incidental findings in human subjects research: analysis and recommendations. J Law Med & Ethics. 2008 Summer;36(2):219–248. 219. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Gluecker TM, Johnson CD, Wilson LA, et al. Extracolonic findings at CT colonography: evaluation of prevalence and cost in a screening population. Gastroenterology. 2003 Apr;124(4):911–916. - PubMed
    1. Hara AK. Extracolonic findings at CT colonography. Semin Ultrasound CT MR. 2005 Feb;26(1):24–27. - PubMed
    1. Hara AK, Johnson CD, MacCarty RL, Welch TJ. Incidental extracolonic findings at CT colonography. Radiology. 2000 May;215(2):353–357. - PubMed
    1. Siddiki H, Fletcher J, McFarland B, et al. Incidental findings in CT colonography: literature review and survey of current research practice. J Law Med & Ethics. 2007;36(2):320–331. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms