Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2010 Sep;89(3):287-99.
doi: 10.1007/s12041-010-0040-z.

Fruitless alternative splicing and sex behaviour in insects: an ancient and unforgettable love story?

Affiliations
Review

Fruitless alternative splicing and sex behaviour in insects: an ancient and unforgettable love story?

Marco Salvemini et al. J Genet. 2010 Sep.

Abstract

Courtship behaviours are common features of animal species that reproduce sexually. Typically, males are involved in courting females. Insects display an astonishing variety of courtship strategies primarily based on innate stereotyped responses to various external stimuli. In Drosophila melanogaster, male courtship requires proteins encoded by the fruitless (fru) gene that are produced in different sex-specific isoforms via alternative splicing. Drosophila mutant flies with loss-of-function alleles of the fru gene exhibit blocked male courtship behaviour. However, various individual steps in the courtship ritual are disrupted in fly strains carrying different fru alleles. These findings suggest that fru is required for specific steps in courtship. In distantly related insect species, various fru paralogues were isolated, which shows conservation of sex-specific alternative splicing and protein expression in neural tissues and suggests an evolutionary functional conservation of fru in the control of male-specific courtship behaviour. In this review, we report the seminal findings regarding the fru gene, its splicing regulation and evolution in insects.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Mol Cell Biol. 1998 Jan;18(1):450-8 - PubMed
    1. Genetics. 1984 Jun;107(2):231-77 - PubMed
    1. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2009 Jun 16;106(24):9737-42 - PubMed
    1. Nat Cell Biol. 2000 Aug;2(8):500-6 - PubMed
    1. J Mol Evol. 1984;21(1):1-13 - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources