Biomaterials in urinary incontinence and treatment of their complications
- PMID: 20877601
- PMCID: PMC2938547
- DOI: 10.4103/0970-1591.65394
Biomaterials in urinary incontinence and treatment of their complications
Abstract
Biomaterials integrate with the anatomy and provide support to the weakened area. They are generally synthetic, but natural substances are also used. These substances are being increasingly used in stress urinary incontinence. This article discusses the various biomaterials, minimally invasive techniques, and recent advances for the treatment of female stress urinary incontinence. In addition, their complications and subsequent management are explored.
Keywords: Biomaterials; female; incontinence; injectables; slings.
Conflict of interest statement
References
-
- Mcguire EJ, Lytton B. Pubovaginal sling procedure for stress incontinence. J Urol. 1978;119:82–4. - PubMed
-
- Amundsen CL, Flynn BJ, Webster GD. Urethral erosion after synthetic and nonsynthetic pubovaginal slings: Differences in management and continence outcome. J Urol. 2003;170:134–7. - PubMed
-
- Karlovsky ME, Kushner L, Badlani GH. Synthetic biomaterials for pelvic floor reconstruction. Curr Urol Rep. 2005;6:376–84. - PubMed
-
- FitzGerald MP, Mollenhauer J, Brubaker L. The fate of rectus fascia suburethral slings. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2000;183:964–6. - PubMed
-
- Wadie BS, Edwan A, Nabeeh AM. Autologous fascial sling vs polypropylene tape at short-term follow-up: A prospective randomized study. J Urol. 2005;174:990–3. - PubMed