Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2010 Dec;12(6):505-11.
doi: 10.1007/s11920-010-0156-0.

New ways to classify bipolar disorders: going from categorical groups to symptom clusters or dimensions

Affiliations
Review

New ways to classify bipolar disorders: going from categorical groups to symptom clusters or dimensions

Chantal Henry et al. Curr Psychiatry Rep. 2010 Dec.

Abstract

Current psychiatric disorder classifications are based exclusively on categorical models, which were designed to increase the reliability of diagnoses. However, this system has some limitations, and various psychiatric disorders may be classified using a dimensional approach, which is more appropriate when no clear boundaries exist between entities or when examining various features on a continuum. Thus, the forthcoming DSM-5 appears to be undertaking a hybrid approach by including categorical models associated with dimensions. We aim to review examples of dimensions or symptom clusters associated with a categorical approach that could be useful in refining bipolar disorder classification. We selected predominant polarity, psychotic symptoms, inhibition/activation behavioral level, and emotional reactivity to define mood episodes, impulsivity/suicidality/substance misuse, and cognitive impairment. The selection was based on the fact that these dimensions or symptom clusters are currently being discussed to be implemented in the DSM-5 and/or may orientate toward the choice of specific treatments and represent more homogeneous and thus more appropriate subgroups for research purposes. In the future, there will be a need to identify biomarkers that can definitively validate the use of these criteria.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Disclosure: No potential conflicts of interest relevant to this article were reported.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. APA. Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders. 4. Paris: Masson; 1994.
    1. World Health Organization. The ICD10 classification of mental and behavioral disorders: diagnostic criteria for research. Geneva: WHO; 1993.
    1. Muzina DJ. Pharmacologic treatment of rapid cycling and mixed states in bipolar disorder: an argument for the use of lithium. Bipolar Disord. 2009;11 (Suppl 2):84–91. - PubMed
    1. Bauer M, Beaulieu S, Dunner DL, Lafer B, Kupka R. Rapid cycling bipolar disorder--diagnostic concepts. Bipolar Disord. 2008;10:153–162. - PubMed
    1. Colom F, Vieta E, Daban C, Pacchiarotti I, Sanchez-Moreno J. Clinical and therapeutic implications of predominant polarity in bipolar disorder. J Affect Disord. 2006;93:13–17. - PubMed

MeSH terms