Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2010 Oct;13(5):275-84.
doi: 10.1089/pop.2010.0027.

Impact of the prevention plan on employee health risk reduction

Affiliations

Impact of the prevention plan on employee health risk reduction

Ronald Loeppke et al. Popul Health Manag. 2010 Oct.

Abstract

This study evaluated the impact of The Prevention Plan™ on employee health risks after 1 year of integrated primary prevention (wellness and health promotion) and secondary prevention (biometric and lab screening as well as early detection) interventions. The Prevention Plan is an innovative prevention benefit that provides members with the high-tech/high-touch support and encouragement they need to adopt healthy behaviors. Support services include 24/7 nurse hotlines, one-on-one health coaching, contests, group events, and employer incentives. Specifically, we analyzed changes in 15 health risk measures among a cohort of 2606 employees from multiple employer groups who completed a baseline health risk appraisal, blood tests, and biometric screening in 2008 and who were reassessed in 2009. We then compared the data to the Edington Natural Flow of risks. The cohort showed significant reduction in 10 of the health risks measured (9 at P≤ 0.01 and 1 at P≤0.05). The most noticeable changes in health risks were a reduction in the proportion of employees with high-risk blood pressure (42.78%), high-risk fasting blood sugar (31.13%), and high-risk stress (24.94%). There was an overall health risk transition among the cohort with net movement from higher risk levels to lower risk levels (P<0.01). There was a net increase of 9.40% of people in the low-risk category, a decrease of 3.61% in the moderate-risk category, and a 5.79% decrease in the high-risk category. Compared to Edington's Natural Flow model, 48.70% of individuals in the high-risk category moved from high risk to moderate risk (Natural Flow 31%), 46.35% moved from moderate risk to low risk (Natural Flow 35%), 15.65% moved from high risk to low risk (Natural Flow 6%), and 87.33% remained in the low-risk category (Natural Flow 70%) (P<0.001).

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

FIG. 1.
FIG. 1.
Health risk level transitions between 2008 and 2009.

Comment in

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Kaiser/HRET survey of Employer-sponsored Health Benefits, 1999–2009. http://ehbs.kff.org/ [Jun 19;2010 ]. http://ehbs.kff.org/
    1. Truffer CJ. Heehan S. Smith S, et al. Health spending projections through 2019: the recession's impact continues. Health Affairs (Milwood) 2010;29:522–529. - PubMed
    1. Loeppke R. Taitel M. Haufle V. Parry T. Kessler RC. Jinnett K. Health and productivity as a business strategy: a multiemployer study. J Occup Environ Med. 2009;51:411–428. - PubMed
    1. Loeppke R. Taitel M. Richling D, et al. Health and productivity as a business strategy. J Occup Environ Med. 2007;49:712–721. - PubMed
    1. Loeppke R. Hymel PA. Lofland JH, et al. Health-related workplace productivity measurement: general and migraine-specific recommendations from the ACOEM expert panel. J Occup Environ Med. 2003;45:349–359. - PubMed