Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2010:10:122.
doi: 10.1673/031.010.12201.

Proboscis conditioning experiments with honeybees, Apis mellifera caucasica, with butyric acid and DEET mixture as conditioned and unconditioned stimuli

Charles I Abramson  1 , Tugrul Giray, T Andrew Mixson, Sondra L Nolf, Harrington Wells, Aykut Kence, Meral Kence
Affiliations

Proboscis conditioning experiments with honeybees, Apis mellifera caucasica, with butyric acid and DEET mixture as conditioned and unconditioned stimuli

Charles I Abramson et al. J Insect Sci. 2010.

Abstract

Three experiments are described investigating whether olfactory repellents DEET and butyric acid can support the classical conditioning of proboscis extension in the honeybee, Apis mellifera caucasica (Hymenoptera: Apidae). In the first experiment DEET and butyric acid readily led to standard acquisition and extinction effects, which are comparable to the use of cinnamon as a conditioned stimulus. These results demonstrate that the odor of DEET or butyric acid is not intrinsically repellent to honey bees. In a second experiment, with DEET and butyric acid mixed with sucrose as an unconditioned stimulus, proboscis conditioning was not established. After several trials, few animals responded to the unconditioned stimulus. These results demonstrate that these chemicals are gustatory repellents when in direct contact. In the last experiment a conditioned suppression paradigm was used. Exposing animals to butyric acid or DEET when the proboscis was extended by direct sucrose stimulation or by learning revealed that retraction of the proboscis was similar to another novel odor, lavender, and in all cases greatest when the animal was not permitted to feed. These results again demonstrate that DEET or butyric acid are not olfactory repellents, and in addition, conditioned suppression is influenced by feeding state of the bee.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Performance of paired and unpaired Apis melllifera caucasica given a conditioned stimulus of either cinnamon, DEET, or butyric acid. The transition from acquisition to extinction occurs on trial 13. Results are reported as the proportion of elicited responses for each trial. High quality figures are available online.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Comparison of unconditioned responses of Apis melllifera caucasica to sucrose alone, sucrose mixed with DEET, or sucrose mixed with butyric acid in animals receiving paired or unpaired training. Results are reported as the proportion of elicited responses for each trial. High quality figures are available online.
Figure 3.
Figure 3.
Effect of butyric acid (BA), DEET (25%), and lavender odor (control odor) on proboscis extension by Apis melllifera caucasica elicited by antenna stimulation. Results are reported as the proportion of elicited responses. High quality figures are available online.
Figure 4.
Figure 4.
Effect of butyric acid (BA), DEET (25%), and lavender (control odor) on proboscis extension elicited by learning in Apis melllifera caucasica. Results are reported as the proportion of elicited responses. High quality figures are available online.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Abramson CI. A primer of invertebrate learning: the behavioral perspective. American Psychological Association; 1994.
    1. Abramson CI. Aversive conditioning in honeybees (Apis mellifera). Journal of Comparative Psychology. 1986;100:108–116.
    1. Abramson CI, Bitterman ME. Latent inhibition in honeybees. Animal Learning and Behavior. 1986a;13:184–189.
    1. Abramson CI, Bitterman ME. The US-preexposure effect in honeybees. Animal Learning and Behavior. 1986b;14:374–379.
    1. Abramson CI, Boyd BJ. An automated apparatus for conditioning proboscis extension in honeybees (Apis mellifera L.). Journal of Entomological Science. 2001;36:78–92.

Publication types