Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2010 Oct;44(10):985-95.
doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2923.2010.03766.x.

Predictors of job satisfaction among academic faculty members: do instructional and clinical staff differ?

Affiliations

Predictors of job satisfaction among academic faculty members: do instructional and clinical staff differ?

Kevin C Chung et al. Med Educ. 2010 Oct.

Abstract

Objectives: This study aimed to identify and compare predictors of job satisfaction between instructional and clinical faculty members.

Methods: A 61-item faculty job satisfaction survey was distributed to 1898 academic faculty members at the University of Michigan Medical School. The anonymous survey was web-based. Questions covered topics on departmental organisation, research, clinical and teaching support, compensation, mentorship, and promotion. Levels of satisfaction were contrasted between faculty members on the two tracks, and predictors of job satisfaction were identified using linear regression models.

Results: Response rates for the instructional and clinical faculty groups were 43.1% and 46.7%, respectively. Clinical faculty members reported being less satisfied with how they were mentored and fewer reported understanding the process for promotion. There was no significant difference in overall job satisfaction between the two faculty groups. Surprisingly, clinical faculty members with mentors were significantly less satisfied with how they were mentored and with career advancement, and were significantly less likely to choose an academic career if they had to do it all over again compared with instructional faculty mentees. Additionally, senior-level clinical faculty members were significantly less satisfied with their opportunities to mentor junior faculty members compared with senior-level instructional faculty staff. Significant predictors of job satisfaction for both groups included areas of autonomy, meeting career expectations, work-life balance, and departmental leadership. In the clinical track only, compensation and career advancement variables also emerged as significant predictors of overall job satisfaction.

Conclusions: Greater emphasis must be placed on faculty members' well-being at both the institutional level and the level of departmental leadership. Efforts to enhance job satisfaction and improve retention are more likely to succeed if they are directed by locally designed assessments involving department chairs and are specifically aimed at fostering more effective mentoring relationships and increasing the opportunities available for career advancement activities such as research work. Our findings show that these strategies can have significant impacts on job satisfaction and the retention of clinical track faculty members.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Conceptual Framework for Comparing Instructional and Clinical Track Faculty Job Satisfaction

References

    1. Alexander H, Lang J. The long-term retention and attrition of U.S. medical school faculty. AAMC Analysis in Brief. 2008;8:1–2.
    1. Linzer M, Konrad TR, Douglas J, et al. Managed care, time pressure, and physician job satisfaction: Results from the physician worklife study. J Gen Intern Med. 2000;15(7):441–450. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Schloss EP, Flanagan DM, Culler CL, Wright AL. Some hidden costs of faculty turnover in clinical departments in one academic medical center. Acad Med. 2009;84(1):32–36. - PubMed
    1. Waldman JD, Kelly F, Arora S, Smith HL. The shocking cost of turnover in health care. Health Care Manage Rev. 2004;29(1):2–7. - PubMed
    1. Faculty handbook 2008–2009. [Accessed August 21, 2009]. University of Michigan Medical School. Criteria for appointment and promotion. Available at: www.med.umich.edu/Medschool/faculty/handbook.pdf.

Publication types