Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2010 Dec;23(6):643-8.
doi: 10.1097/WCO.0b013e32833fd540.

Biomarkers in frontotemporal lobar degeneration

Affiliations
Review

Biomarkers in frontotemporal lobar degeneration

Murray Grossman. Curr Opin Neurol. 2010 Dec.

Abstract

Purpose of review: Recent findings assessing the utility of neuroimaging and biofluid biomarkers are reviewed that help identify patients with frontotemporal lobar degeneration (FTLD) spectrum abnormality.

Recent findings: Neuroimaging studies using T1 structural MRI and diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) distinguish between patients with FTLD and Alzheimer's disease, although the reliability of these group-level findings in individual patients has been assessed only rarely. However, innovative analyses such as support vector machine approaches are able to integrate T1 and DTI imaging results and to identify specific MRI profiles that distinguish between individual patients with FTLD and Alzheimer's disease. Novel radioligand positron emission tomography assessments also can recognize Alzheimer's disease patients with a clinical phenotype resembling that seen in FTLD. Biofluid studies identify about 15% of patients with FTLD due to a genetic mutation that is associated with the specific histopathologic features of TDP-43 or a tauopathy. Other genetically-based risk factors and targeted proteomic searches of plasma and cerebrospinal fluid have suggested additional markers in sporadic cases of FTLD that will lead to the identification of patients with TDP-43 or tau histopathology.

Summary: Great progress has been made in developing biomarkers for FTLD, but additional work is needed to extend these advances so that the histopathologic abnormality causing FTLD can be specified in an individual patient.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. Cortical atrophy corresponding to primary progressive aphasia syndromes1
1Frontal = nonfluent/agrammatic variant PPA; anterior temporal = mantic variant; posterior temporal-parietal = logopenic variant. Printed with permission from: Grossman M. Primary progressive aphasia: Clinical-pathological correlations. Nature Reviews Neurology 2010; 88–97.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Mackenzie IR, Neumann M, Bigio E, et al. Nomenclature for neuropathologic subtypes of frontotemporal lobar degeneration: consensus recommendations. Acta Neuropathologica. 2009;117:15–18. Important nosologic characterization of FTLD spectrum abnormality. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Neumann M, Sampathu DM, Kwong LK, et al. Ubiquinated TDP-43 in frontotemporal lobar degeneration and amyotrophic lateral sclereosis. Science. 2006;314:130–133. - PubMed
    1. Forman MS, Farmer J, Johnson JK, et al. Frontotemporal dementia: clinico-pathological correlations. Ann Neurol. 2006;59:952–962. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Neumann M, Rademakers R, Roeber S, et al. Frontotemporal lobar degeneration with FUS pathology. Brain. 2009:awp214. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Snowden J, Neary D, Mann D. Frontotemporal lobar degeneration: clinical and pathological relationships. Acta Neuropathologica. 2007;114:31–38. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms