Efficacy and safety of bivalirudin in patients receiving clopidogrel therapy after diagnostic angiography for percutaneous coronary intervention in acute coronary syndromes
- PMID: 20882655
- DOI: 10.1002/ccd.22546
Efficacy and safety of bivalirudin in patients receiving clopidogrel therapy after diagnostic angiography for percutaneous coronary intervention in acute coronary syndromes
Abstract
Objectives: This study sought to investigate if the efficacy of bivalirudin monotherapy is similar to heparin plus GP IIb/IIIa inhibition in patients with acute coronary syndromes (ACS) treated with clopidogrel following diagnostic angiography.
Background: Prior trials have demonstrated that peri-procedural bivalirudin therapy confers similar efficacy as heparin plus GP IIb/IIIa inhibitors, while lowering the risk of bleeding complications in ACS patients undergoing percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI). However, the incidence of adverse ischemic events post-PCI appeared to be higher in patients receiving bivalirudin without adequate pretreatment with clopidogrel.
Methods: Using the 2004/2005 Cornell Angioplasty Registry, we evaluated 980 consecutive patients undergoing urgent PCI for UA/NSTEMI who were treated with either bivalirudin or UFH plus GP IIb/IIIa inhibitor. We excluded patients who were on chronic clopidogrel therapy or received clopidogrel pretreatment prior to angiography. All patients received a clopidogrel load (≥300-mg dose) immediately before or after the PCI. Long-term all-cause mortality was obtained for 100% of patients, with a mean follow-up of 24.6 ± 7.7 months.
Results: Of the 980 study patients, 461 (47.0%) were treated with bivalirudin and 519 (53.0%) patients received UFH plus GP IIb/IIIa inhibitor. DES were used in 88% of PCI; 45% of patients presented with NSTEMI. The incidence of in-hospital death (0.4% vs. 0.2%, P = 0.604), post-procedural MI (6.9% vs. 5.4%, P = 0.351), and MACE including death, stroke, emergent CABG/PCI, and MI (7.6% vs. 5.8%, P = 0.304) were similar in patients treated with bivalirudin versus UFH plus GP IIb/IIIa inhibitors, respectively. The incidence of in-hospital stent thrombosis was similar (0.7% vs. 0%, P = 0.104), while major (0.9% vs. 2.9%, P = 0.034) and minor bleeding (10.4% vs. 18.9%, P < 0.001) was reduced in the bivalirudin-treated group. By two-years of follow-up, after propensity-score adjusted multivariate Cox regression analysis, there was no significant difference in long-term mortality between the two groups (HR 1.18; 95%CI 0.64-2.19, P = 0.598).
Conclusions: In patients presenting with ACS and receiving clopidogrel treatment after angiography (before or within 30 min of PCI), peri-procedural bivalirudin monotherapy suppresses acute and long-term adverse events to a similar extent as does UFH plus GP IIb/IIIa inhibitors, while significantly lowering the risk of bleeding complications.
© 2010 Wiley-Liss, Inc.
Comment in
-
It is standard practice, but is it really best practice or clinical biocreep?Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2010 Oct 1;76(4):525-6. doi: 10.1002/ccd.22775. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2010. PMID: 20882656 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
Influence of timing of clopidogrel treatment on the efficacy and safety of bivalirudin in patients with non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndromes undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention: an analysis of the ACUITY (Acute Catheterization and Urgent Intervention Triage strategY) trial.JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2008 Dec;1(6):639-48. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2008.10.004. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2008. PMID: 19463378 Clinical Trial.
-
Efficacy and safety of bivalirudin in patients with diabetes mellitus undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention in current clinical practice.J Invasive Cardiol. 2010 Mar;22(3):94-100. J Invasive Cardiol. 2010. PMID: 20197573
-
Frequency and outcomes of provisional glycoprotein IIb/IIIa blockade in patients receiving bivalirudin during percutaneous coronary intervention.J Invasive Cardiol. 2009 Jun;21(6):258-63. J Invasive Cardiol. 2009. PMID: 19494400
-
Comparison of bivalirudin versus heparin plus glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors in patients undergoing an invasive strategy: a meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials.Int J Cardiol. 2011 Nov 3;152(3):369-74. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2010.08.007. Epub 2010 Sep 16. Int J Cardiol. 2011. PMID: 20843568 Review.
-
Meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials comparing bivalirudin versus heparin plus glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention and in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction.Am J Cardiol. 2014 Jul 15;114(2):250-9. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2014.04.033. Epub 2014 May 2. Am J Cardiol. 2014. PMID: 24890986 Review.
Cited by
-
Occurrence and Risk Factors of Adverse Drug Reactions in Patients Receiving Bivalirudin as Anticoagulant During Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: A Prospective, Multi-Center, Intensive Monitoring Study.Front Cardiovasc Med. 2022 Apr 29;8:781632. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2021.781632. eCollection 2021. Front Cardiovasc Med. 2022. PMID: 35573935 Free PMC article.
-
Contemporary use of arterial and venous conduits in coronary artery bypass grafting: anatomical, functional and clinical aspects.Neth Heart J. 2017 Jan;25(1):4-13. doi: 10.1007/s12471-016-0919-2. Neth Heart J. 2017. PMID: 27878548 Free PMC article. Review.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous