Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2010:10:139.
doi: 10.1673/031.010.13901.

Comparison of lures loaded with codlemone and pear ester for capturing codling moths, Cydia pomonella, in apple and pear orchards using mating disruption

Affiliations
Comparative Study

Comparison of lures loaded with codlemone and pear ester for capturing codling moths, Cydia pomonella, in apple and pear orchards using mating disruption

D E Fernández et al. J Insect Sci. 2010.

Abstract

Abstract Studies were conducted in apple, Malus domestica Borkhausen and pear, Pyrus communis L. (Rosales: Rosaceae), orchards to evaluate the attractiveness of grey halobutyl septa loaded with 1 (L2) and 10 (Mega) mg of codlemone, 8E, 10E-dodecadien-1-ol, 3 mg of pear ester, ethyl (E,Z)-2,4-decadienoate (DA2313), and 3 mg of pear ester plus 3 mg of codlemone (Combo) to adult codling moth, Cydia pomonella (L.) (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae). All studies were conducted in orchards treated with pheromone mating disruption. All four lures were tested on diamond-shaped sticky traps placed in 60 plots of apple and 40 plots of pears in 2003/04, and in 62 plots of apples and 30 of pears in 2004–05. Combo lures attracted significantly more moths (males + females) than all the others in both years. Comparisons among flights showed significant differences mainly for flight 1 and 2, but not always for flight 3. Mega lures provided no significant improvement compared with L2 lures during both seasons regarding the total number of moths. Combo and DA2313 lures attracted fewer females than males during the whole season. For most sample dates, more virgin than mated females were attracted to Combo lures, except during the third flight, and the overall ratio was 60:40, although the difference was not statistically significant. We conclude that the Combo lures are better indicators of codling moth activity in pheromone treated orchards, regardless of pest population level, when compared with similar lures containing codlemone or pear ester alone.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Mean (± SE) catches of Cydia pomonella in traps baited with L2, Mega, DA2313 and Combo lures in apple and pear orchards during 2003/04 and 2004/05. Means with the same letter for each flight are not significantly different using the Wald statistic with 5% significance level. High quality figures are available online.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Mean (± SE) catches of Cydia pomonella in traps baited with DA2313 and Combo lures in apple and pear orchards during 2003/04 and 2004/05. Means with the same letter for each flight are not significantly different using the Wald statistic with 5% significance level. High quality figures are available online.
Figure 3.
Figure 3.
Mean (± SE) catches of male and female Cydia pomonella in traps baited with DA2313 and Combo lures in apple and pear orchards during 2003/04 and 2004/05. Means with the same letter for each flight are not significantly different using the Wald statistic with 5% significance level. High quality figures are available online.
Figure 4.
Figure 4.
Mean (± SE) catches of virgin and mated female Cydia pomonella in traps baited with DA2313 and Combo lures in apple and pear orchards during 2003/04 and 2004/05. Means with the same letter for each flight are not significantly different using the Wald statistic with 5% significance level. High quality figures are available online.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Ansebo L, Coracini MDA, Bengtsson M, Liblikas I, Ramirez M, Borg-Karlson AK, Tasin M, Witzgall P. Antennal and behavioural response of codling moth Cydia pomonella to plant volatiles. Journal of Applied Entomology. 2004;128:488–493.
    1. Bosch D, Burballa A, Sarasúa MJS, Hernandez JA. Control de carpocapsa (Cydia pomonella) mediante confusióón sexual y fenoxycarb. Fruticultura Profesional. 1998;99:52–62.
    1. Brunner JF. Pheromone as control tactics for codling moth. WSU-IFAFS-RAMP Workshop; 2006. Available online, http://entomology.tfrec.wsu.edu/stableipm/WorkshopPDFs/cmpheromone.pdf.
    1. Casado D, Gemeno C, Avilla J, Riba M. Day-night and phenological variation of apple tree volatiles and electroantenograma responses in Cydia pomonella (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae). Environmental Entomology. 2006;35:258–267.
    1. Cichón L, Fernández D. Fruticultura Moderna. 9 años de cooperación técnica 1990–1999. Parte 2, Cap. 4. INTA-GTZ; 1999. La técnica de la confusión sexual en carpocapsa. Desarrollo en el Alto Valle de Rio Negro y Neuquén. pp. 88–95.

Publication types