Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2010 Dec;25(6):917-35.
doi: 10.1093/her/cyq042. Epub 2010 Sep 30.

Process evaluation of a tobacco prevention program in Indian schools--methods, results and lessons learnt

Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Process evaluation of a tobacco prevention program in Indian schools--methods, results and lessons learnt

Shifalika Goenka et al. Health Educ Res. 2010 Dec.

Abstract

In India, 57% of men between 15 and 54 years and 10.8% of women between 15 and 49 years use tobacco. A wide variety of tobacco gets used and the poor and the underprivileged are the dominant victims of tobacco and its adverse consequences. Project MYTRI (Mobilizing Youth for Tobacco-Related Initiatives in India) was a tobacco prevention intervention program, a cluster-randomized trial in 32 Indian schools which aimed to decrease susceptibility to tobacco use among sixth- to ninth-grade students in urban settings in India. This culture-specific intervention, which addressed both smokeless and smoked forms of tobacco, was Indian in content and communication. We qualitatively developed indicators which would help accurately measure the dose of the intervention given, received and reached. A multi-staged process evaluation was done through both subjective and objective measures. Training the teachers critically contributed toward a rigorous implementation and also correlated with the outcomes, as did a higher proportion of students participating in the classroom discussions and better peer-leader-student communication. A sizeable proportion of subjective responses were 'socially desirable', making objective assessment a preferred methodology even for 'dose received'. The peer-led health activism was successful. Teachers' manuals need to be concise.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1.
Fig. 1.
School-level scores of relative change in susceptibility to chew tobacco and rigor of implementation of intra-session components.

References

    1. WHO Report on the Global Tobacco Epidemic. The MPOWER Package. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization; 2008.
    1. Mathers CD, Loncar D. Projections of global mortality and burden of disease from 2002 to 2030. PLoS Med. 2006;3:e442. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Report on Tobacco Control in India. Ministry of Health and Family Welfare. New Delhi, India: Govt of India; 2004.
    1. National Family Heatlh Survey (NFHS)—2005-2006. Use of Tobacco: A Fact Sheet. 2009. Available at: http://www.whoindia.org/LinkFiles/Tobacco_Free_Initiative_nfhs3pdf Accessed: 4 September 2010.
    1. Mishra A, Arora M, Stigler MH, et al. Indian youth speak about tobacco: results of focus group discussions with school students. Health Educ Behav. 2005;32:363–79. - PubMed

Publication types