Human papillomavirus-based cervical cancer prevention: long-term results of a randomized screening trial
- PMID: 20884893
- DOI: 10.1093/jnci/djq342
Human papillomavirus-based cervical cancer prevention: long-term results of a randomized screening trial
Abstract
Background: Screen-and-treat approaches to cervical cancer prevention are an attractive option for low-resource settings, but data on their long-term efficacy are lacking. We evaluated the efficacy of two screen-and-treat approaches through 36 months of follow-up in a randomized trial.
Methods: A total of 6637 unscreened South African women aged 35-65 years who were tested for the presence of high-risk human papillomavirus (HPV) DNA in cervical samples underwent visual inspection of the cervix using acetic acid staining and HIV serotesting. Of these, 6555 were randomly assigned to three study arms: 1) HPV-and-treat, in which all women with a positive HPV DNA test result underwent cryotherapy; 2) visual inspection-and-treat, in which all women with a positive visual inspection test result underwent cryotherapy; or 3) control, in which further evaluation or treatment was delayed for 6 months. All women underwent colposcopy with biopsy at 6 months. All women who were HPV DNA- or visual inspection-positive at enrollment, and a subset of all other women had extended follow-up to 36 months (n = 3639) with yearly colposcopy. The endpoint-cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 2 or worse (CIN2+)-was analyzed using actuarial life-table methods. All statistical tests were two-sided.
Results: After 36 months, there was a sustained statistically significant decrease in the cumulative detection of CIN2+ in the HPV-and-treat arm compared with the control arm (1.5% vs 5.6%, difference = 4.1%, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 2.8% to 5.3%, P < .001). The difference in the cumulative detection of CIN2+ in the visual inspection-and-treat arm compared with the control was less (3.8% vs 5.6%, difference = 1.8%, 95% CI = 0.4% to 3.2%, P = .002). Incident cases of CIN2+ (identified more than 12 months after enrollment) were less common in the HPV-and-treat arm (0.3%, 95% CI = 0.05% to 1.02%) than in the control (1.0%, 95% CI = 0.5% to 1.7%) or visual inspection-and-treat (1.3%, 95% CI = 0.8% to 2.1%) arms.
Conclusions: In this trial, a screen-and-treat approach using HPV DNA testing identified and treated prevalent cases of CIN2+ and appeared to reduce the number of incident cases of CIN2+ that developed more than 12 months after cryotherapy.
Comment in
-
Preventing cervical cancer globally by acting locally: if not now, when?J Natl Cancer Inst. 2010 Oct 20;102(20):1524-7. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djq382. Epub 2010 Sep 30. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2010. PMID: 20884892 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
Results at recruitment from a randomized controlled trial comparing human papillomavirus testing alone with conventional cytology as the primary cervical cancer screening test.J Natl Cancer Inst. 2008 Apr 2;100(7):492-501. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djn065. Epub 2008 Mar 25. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2008. PMID: 18364502 Clinical Trial.
-
Screen-and-treat approaches for cervical cancer prevention in low-resource settings: a randomized controlled trial.JAMA. 2005 Nov 2;294(17):2173-81. doi: 10.1001/jama.294.17.2173. JAMA. 2005. PMID: 16264158 Clinical Trial.
-
Age-specific evaluation of primary human papillomavirus screening vs conventional cytology in a randomized setting.J Natl Cancer Inst. 2009 Dec 2;101(23):1612-23. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djp367. Epub 2009 Nov 9. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2009. PMID: 19903804 Clinical Trial.
-
Human papillomavirus testing in the prevention of cervical cancer.J Natl Cancer Inst. 2011 Mar 2;103(5):368-83. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djq562. Epub 2011 Jan 31. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2011. PMID: 21282563 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Clinical Practice Guidelines on the Screening and Treatment of Precancerous Lesions for Cervical Cancer Prevention in Saudi Arabia.Ann Saudi Med. 2016 Sep-Oct;36(5):313-320. doi: 10.5144/0256-4947.2016.313. Ann Saudi Med. 2016. PMID: 27710981 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Cervical cancer in Ethiopia: survival of 1,059 patients who received oncologic therapy.Oncologist. 2014 Jul;19(7):727-34. doi: 10.1634/theoncologist.2013-0326. Epub 2014 Jun 20. Oncologist. 2014. PMID: 24951611 Free PMC article.
-
EUROGIN 2011 roadmap on prevention and treatment of HPV-related disease.Int J Cancer. 2012 Nov 1;131(9):1969-82. doi: 10.1002/ijc.27650. Epub 2012 Jul 2. Int J Cancer. 2012. PMID: 22623137 Free PMC article. Review.
-
The IARC Perspective on Cervical Cancer Screening.N Engl J Med. 2021 Nov 11;385(20):1908-1918. doi: 10.1056/NEJMsr2030640. N Engl J Med. 2021. PMID: 34758259 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
-
Clinical evaluation of modifications to a human papillomavirus assay to optimise its utility for cervical cancer screening in low-resource settings: a diagnostic accuracy study.Lancet Glob Health. 2020 Feb;8(2):e296-e304. doi: 10.1016/S2214-109X(19)30527-3. Lancet Glob Health. 2020. PMID: 31981559 Free PMC article.
-
Accuracy of triage strategies for human papillomavirus DNA-positive women in low-resource settings: A cross-sectional study in China.Chin J Cancer Res. 2017 Dec;29(6):496-509. doi: 10.21147/j.issn.1000-9604.2017.06.04. Chin J Cancer Res. 2017. PMID: 29353972 Free PMC article.