Quality of original and biosimilar epoetin products
- PMID: 20886265
- PMCID: PMC3026707
- DOI: 10.1007/s11095-010-0288-2
Quality of original and biosimilar epoetin products
Abstract
Purpose: To compare the quality of therapeutic erythropoietin (EPO) products, including two biosimilars, with respect to content, aggregation, isoform profile and potency.
Methods: Two original products, Eprex (epoetin alpha) and Dynepo (epoetin delta), and two biosimilar products, Binocrit (epoetin alpha) and Retacrit (epoetin zeta), were compared using (1) high performance size exclusion chromatography, (2) ELISA, (3) SDS-PAGE, (4) capillary zone electrophoresis and (5) in-vivo potency.
Results: Tested EPO products differed in content, isoform composition, and potency.
Conclusion: Of the tested products, the biosimilars have the same or even better quality as the originals. Especially, the potency of originals may significantly differ from the value on the label.
Conflict of interest statement
This research was sponsored by Roche. H.S. has given presentations during congresses sponsored by companies producing epoetin products. The research group at the Department of Pharmaceutics, Utrecht Institute for Pharmaceutical Sciences (UIPS), Utrecht University has received grants funded by Roche, Hospira, Organon and Merck-Serono. V.B., A.H., A.H.H.B., L.J.R., R.H., G.W.S. and W.J. declare no conflict of interest.
Figures
References
-
- Schellekens H. Biosimilar epoetins: how similar are they? Eur J Hosp Pharm. 2004;3:43–7.
-
- EMEA/CHMP/94528/2005. Guideline on similar biological medicinal products. In 2005.
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Research Materials
