Twenty-five pitfalls in the analysis of diffusion MRI data
- PMID: 20886566
- DOI: 10.1002/nbm.1543
Twenty-five pitfalls in the analysis of diffusion MRI data
Abstract
Obtaining reliable data and drawing meaningful and robust inferences from diffusion MRI can be challenging and is subject to many pitfalls. The process of quantifying diffusion indices and eventually comparing them between groups of subjects and/or correlating them with other parameters starts at the acquisition of the raw data, followed by a long pipeline of image processing steps. Each one of these steps is susceptible to sources of bias, which may not only limit the accuracy and precision, but can lead to substantial errors. This article provides a detailed review of the steps along the analysis pipeline and their associated pitfalls. These are grouped into 1 pre-processing of data; 2 estimation of the tensor; 3 derivation of voxelwise quantitative parameters; 4 strategies for extracting quantitative parameters; and finally 5 intra-subject and inter-subject comparison, including region of interest, histogram, tract-specific and voxel-based analyses. The article covers important aspects of diffusion MRI analysis, such as motion correction, susceptibility and eddy current distortion correction, model fitting, region of interest placement, histogram and voxel-based analysis. We have assembled 25 pitfalls (several previously unreported) into a single article, which should serve as a useful reference for those embarking on new diffusion MRI-based studies, and as a check for those who may already be running studies but may have overlooked some important confounds. While some of these problems are well known to diffusion experts, they might not be to other researchers wishing to undertake a clinical study based on diffusion MRI.
Copyright © 2010 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Similar articles
-
Artifacts and pitfalls in diffusion MRI.J Magn Reson Imaging. 2006 Sep;24(3):478-88. doi: 10.1002/jmri.20683. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2006. PMID: 16897692 Review.
-
On the construction of a ground truth framework for evaluating voxel-based diffusion tensor MRI analysis methods.Neuroimage. 2009 Jul 1;46(3):692-707. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2009.02.032. Epub 2009 Mar 5. Neuroimage. 2009. PMID: 19268708
-
Steady-state diffusion-weighted imaging: theory, acquisition and analysis.NMR Biomed. 2010 Aug;23(7):781-93. doi: 10.1002/nbm.1509. NMR Biomed. 2010. PMID: 20886565 Review.
-
MRI diffusion tensor reconstruction with PROPELLER data acquisition.Magn Reson Imaging. 2004 Feb;22(2):139-48. doi: 10.1016/j.mri.2003.08.001. Magn Reson Imaging. 2004. PMID: 15010105
-
Maximum a posteriori estimation of diffusion tensor parameters using a Rician noise model: why, how and but.Neuroimage. 2008 Oct 1;42(4):1340-56. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2008.05.053. Epub 2008 Jun 6. Neuroimage. 2008. PMID: 18602480
Cited by
-
Choosing the polarity of the phase-encoding direction in diffusion MRI: Does it matter for group analysis?Neuroimage Clin. 2016 Apr 12;11:539-547. doi: 10.1016/j.nicl.2016.03.022. eCollection 2016. Neuroimage Clin. 2016. PMID: 27158586 Free PMC article.
-
In vivo imaging of neuroinflammation in schizophrenia.Schizophr Res. 2016 Jun;173(3):200-212. doi: 10.1016/j.schres.2015.05.034. Epub 2015 Jun 3. Schizophr Res. 2016. PMID: 26048294 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Correcting power and p-value calculations for bias in diffusion tensor imaging.Magn Reson Imaging. 2013 Jul;31(6):857-64. doi: 10.1016/j.mri.2013.01.002. Epub 2013 Mar 5. Magn Reson Imaging. 2013. PMID: 23465764 Free PMC article.
-
A hitchhiker's guide to diffusion tensor imaging.Front Neurosci. 2013 Mar 12;7:31. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2013.00031. eCollection 2013. Front Neurosci. 2013. PMID: 23486659 Free PMC article.
-
In Vivo Super-Resolution Cardiac Diffusion Tensor MRI: A Feasibility Study.Diagnostics (Basel). 2022 Mar 31;12(4):877. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics12040877. Diagnostics (Basel). 2022. PMID: 35453925 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources