Similar articles

• A meta-analysis of randomized and risk-adjusted observational studies of endovascular versus open repair for ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm.

  Takagi H, Umemoto T. Takagi H, et al. Vasc Endovascular Surg. 2011 Nov;45(8):717-9. doi: 10.1177/1538574411418010. Vasc Endovascular Surg. 2011. PMID: 22262115 No abstract available.
• Part one: for the motion. EVAR offers no survival benefit over open repair for the treatment of ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms.

  Dubois L. Dubois L. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2015 Feb;49(2):116-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2014.11.015. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2015. PMID: 25662726 No abstract available.
• Is a randomized trial necessary to determine whether endovascular repair is the preferred management strategy in patients with ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms?

  Veith FJ, Powell JT, Hinchliffe RJ. Veith FJ, et al. J Vasc Surg. 2010 Oct;52(4):1087-93. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2010.05.142. J Vasc Surg. 2010. PMID: 20888535
• Randomized clinical trials of endovascular repair versus surveillance for treatment of small abdominal aortic aneurysms.

  Ouriel K. Ouriel K. J Endovasc Ther. 2009 Feb;16 Suppl 1:I94-105. doi: 10.1583/08-2600.1. J Endovasc Ther. 2009. PMID: 19317579 Review.
• EVAR for ruptured AAAs -- Do we need randomized controlled trials?

  NORDON IM, HINCHLIFFE RJ, HOLT PJ, MORGAN R, LOFTUS IM, THOMPSON MM. NORDON IM, et al. J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino). 2009 Oct;50(5):617-25. J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino). 2009. PMID: 19741577 Review.