Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2012 Feb;35(1):219-24.
doi: 10.1016/j.adolescence.2010.09.001. Epub 2010 Oct 2.

Brief report: Activities in heterosexual romantic relationships: grade differences and associations with relationship satisfaction

Affiliations

Brief report: Activities in heterosexual romantic relationships: grade differences and associations with relationship satisfaction

Wendy Carlson et al. J Adolesc. 2012 Feb.

Abstract

Whereas much research addresses relations of youths' heterosexual romantic relationships with sexual and/or delinquent activities, less attention has been paid to youths' more normative, day-to-day activities with romantic partners. This gap in the literature is problematic given that these activities define the substance of the relationships and likely are connected to relationship satisfaction. In the current study, 223 youths in fifth (28 boys; 32 girls), eighth (31 boys; 40 girls), and eleventh (36 boys; 56 girls) grades reporting current romantic relationships indicated their engagement in activities with romantic partners and relationship satisfaction. Findings revealed important grade differences in activity involvement, with eighth- and eleventh-graders reporting higher engagement than fifth-graders, especially in out-of-school activities. Additionally, engagement in out-of-school activities was most strongly associated with relationship satisfaction for all grades.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Adams RE, Laursen B, Wilder D. Characteristics of closeness in adolescent romantic relationships. Journal of Adolescence. 2001;24:353–363. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Berscheid E, Snyder M, Omoto AM. The relationship closeness inventory: Assessing the closeness of interpersonal relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 1989;57:792–807.
    1. Carlson W, Rose AJ. The role of reciprocity in romantic relationships in middle childhood and early adolescence. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly. 2007;53:262–290.
    1. Carver K, Joyner K, Udry JR. National estimates of adolescent romantic relationships. In: Florsheim P, editor. Adolescent romantic relations and sexual behavior: Theory, research, and practical implications. Mahwah, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum; 2003. pp. 23–56.
    1. Collins WA. More than myth: The developmental significance of romantic relationships during adolescence. Journal of Research on Adolescence. 2003;13:1–24.

Publication types