Clinical pilot study on new dental filling materials and preparation procedures in developing countries

Abstract

Conservative dentistry in developing countries often poses a problem because of lack of expensive dental equipment. This survey was undertaken to test two more appropriate filling materials in vivo. In 94 secondary school students (in Mzuzu, Malawi) with two or more cavities, one cavity was prepared in the conventional way using drilling equipment and then filled with amalgam, and one cavity was prepared using hand instruments only and filled with either cermet ionomer or "miracle mix". Models of the filled teeth (99 amalgam, 53 "miracle mix", 54 cermet ionomer; all of them Class 1) were made and evaluated by three examiners after 6 months and after 1 yr. The fillings were given a score on a four-point scale. One year later all types of filling materials had significantly decreased in quality, but only five fillings (one amalgam, one "miracle mix", and three cermet ionomer) needed replacement. Compared to the amalgam filling in the same mouth, more cermet ionomer and "miracle mix" fillings performed poorly, but these differences were not statistically significant after 1 yr. Both cermet ionomer and "miracle mix" are very promising alternatives for Class I tooth cavities in areas without dental equipment.