Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2010 Oct 26;107(43):18371-4.
doi: 10.1073/pnas.1004659107. Epub 2010 Oct 4.

Forecasting potential global environmental costs of livestock production 2000-2050

Affiliations

Forecasting potential global environmental costs of livestock production 2000-2050

Nathan Pelletier et al. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. .

Abstract

Food systems--in particular, livestock production--are key drivers of environmental change. Here, we compare the contributions of the global livestock sector in 2000 with estimated contributions of this sector in 2050 to three important environmental concerns: climate change, reactive nitrogen mobilization, and appropriation of plant biomass at planetary scales. Because environmental sustainability ultimately requires that human activities as a whole respect critical thresholds in each of these domains, we quantify the extent to which current and future livestock production contributes to published estimates of sustainability thresholds at projected production levels and under several alternative endpoint scenarios intended to illustrate the potential range of impacts associated with dietary choice. We suggest that, by 2050, the livestock sector alone may either occupy the majority of, or significantly overshoot, recently published estimates of humanity's "safe operating space" in each of these domains. In light of the magnitude of estimated impacts relative to these proposed (albeit uncertain) sustainability boundary conditions, we suggest that reining in growth of this sector should be prioritized in environmental governance.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Fig. 1.
Fig. 1.
Potential global environmental costs of livestock 2000–2050: Estimated greenhouse gas emissions (Gt CO2-e) (Left), biomass appropriation (Gt C) (Center), and reactive nitrogen mobilization (Mt Nr) (Right) associated with the global livestock sector in 2000 versus 2050 under FAO production estimates (FAO projections scenario) as well as three alternative scenarios (substitution, livestock, and soy protein) relative to proposed sustainability boundary conditions for human activities in aggregate.

Comment in

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Tilman D, et al. Forecasting agriculturally driven global environmental change. Science. 2001;292:281–284. - PubMed
    1. Millennium Ecosystem Assessment. Ecosystems and Human Well-Being: General Synthesis. Washington, DC: Island Press; 2005.
    1. Krausmann F, Erb K-H, Gingrich S, Lauk C, Haberl H. Global patterns of socioeconomic biomass flows in the year 2000: A comprehensive assessment of supply, consumption and constraints. Ecol Econ. 2008;65:471–487.
    1. Weidema B, et al. Institute for Prospective Technological Studies. Seville, Spain: Joint Research Centre, European Commission; 2008. Environmental improvement potentials of meat and dairy products.
    1. Steinfeld H, et al. Livestock, Environment, and Development Initiative. Rome: United Nations Food and Agriculture Organization; 2006. Livestock’s long shadow. Environmental issues and options.

Publication types

Substances

LinkOut - more resources