Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2010 Oct 27;132(42):14877-85.
doi: 10.1021/ja105312p.

Hydride-containing models for the active site of the nickel-iron hydrogenases

Affiliations

Hydride-containing models for the active site of the nickel-iron hydrogenases

Bryan E Barton et al. J Am Chem Soc. .

Abstract

The [NiFe]-hydrogenase model complex NiFe(pdt)(dppe)(CO)(3) (1) (pdt = 1,3-propanedithiolate) has been efficiently synthesized and found to be robust. This neutral complex sustains protonation to give the first nickel-iron hydride [1H]BF(4). One CO ligand in [1H]BF(4) is readily substituted by organophosphorus ligands to afford the substituted derivatives [HNiFe(pdt)(dppe)(PR(3))(CO)(2)]BF(4), where PR(3) = P(OPh)(3) ([2H]BF(4)); PPh(3) ([3H]BF(4)); PPh(2)Py ([4H]BF(4), where Py = 2-pyridyl). Variable temperature NMR measurements show that the neutral and protonated derivatives are dynamic on the NMR time scale, which partially symmetrizes the phosphine complex. The proposed stereodynamics involve twisting of the Ni(dppe) center, not rotation at the Fe(CO)(2)(PR(3)) center. In MeCN solution, 3, which can be prepared by deprotonation of [3H]BF(4) with NaOMe, is about 10(4) stronger base than is 1. X-ray crystallographic analysis of [3H]BF(4) revealed a highly unsymmetrical bridging hydride, the Fe-H bond being 0.40 Å shorter than the Ni-H distance. Complexes [2H]BF(4), [3H]BF(4), and [4H]BF(4) undergo reductions near -1.46 V vs Fc(0/+). For [2H]BF(4), this reduction process is reversible, and we assign it as a one-electron process. In the presence of trifluoroacetic acid, proton reduction catalysis coincides with this reductive event. The dependence of i(c)/i(p) on the concentration of the acid indicates that H(2) evolution entails protonation of a reduced hydride. For [2H](+), [3H](+), and [4H](+), the acid-independent rate constants are 50-75 s(-1). For [2H](+) and [3H](+), the overpotentials for H(2) evolution are estimated to be 430 mV, whereas the overpotential for the N-protonated pyridinium complex [4H(2)](2+) is estimated to be 260 mV. The mechanism of H(2) evolution is proposed to follow an ECEC sequence, where E and C correspond to one-electron reductions and protonations, respectively. On the basis of their values for its pK(a) and redox potentials, the room temperature values of ΔG(H•) and ΔG(H-) are estimated as respectively as 57 and 79 kcal/mol for [1H](+).

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
500 MHz 1H NMR spectra (CD2Cl2 solution) of [1H]BF4 (bottom, triplet, JPH = 6 Hz) and of [3H]BF4 (top, doublet of triplets, JPH = 35 Hz).
Figure 2
Figure 2
FT-IR spectra in the νCO region for CH2Cl2 solutions of the nickel-iron hydride complexes described in this work (top to bottom): [1H]BF4; [2H]BF4; [3H]BF4; [4H]BF4. The νCO band for the Ni-R state occurs at 1936-1948 cm−1, depending on the organism.
Figure 3
Figure 3
31P{1H} NMR (161 MHz) spectra of CD2Cl2 solutions of [3H]BF4 recorded at various temperatures. The signal at δ 68 is assigned to the Fe(PPh3) center. The dynamic AB quartet at δ 65 is assigned to the Ni(dppe) center. Weak signals at δ 59 and 69 were verified to arise from trace impurities of Ni(pdt)(dppe) and [HNiFe(pdt)(dppe)(CO)3]+, respectively.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Structure of [3H]BF4. Selected distances (Å): Fe(1)-Ni(1), 2.6432(7); Fe(1)-H(1), 1.49(3); Ni(1)-H(1), 1.89(3). Selected Bond angles (°): S(2)-Fe(1)-S(1), 83.27(4); S(2)-Fe(1)-P(1), 93.58(4); C(1)-Fe(1)-C(2), 99.93(17).
Figure 5
Figure 5
FT-IR spectra of CH2Cl2 solutions of [3H]BF4 (top) and 3 (bottom).
Figure 6
Figure 6
31P{1H} NMR spectrum (161 MHz, CD2Cl2, ~20 °C) of 3. Signals at δ 77 and 45 are assigned to dppe, the signal at δ 55 is assigned to PPh3.
Figure 7
Figure 7
Cyclic voltammograms of a 1.85 mM MeCN solution of [2H]+ (left) and a 1.68 mM 9:1 MeCN/CH2Cl2 solution (0.1 M [NBu4]PF6) of 2 (right) at various scan rates, denoted in mV/s.
Figure 8
Figure 8
Scan rate dependence of ipc for the couples [2H]+/0 and 20/+ in CH2Cl2 solution (~1.8 mM complex, 0.1 M [NBu4]PF6).
Figure 9
Figure 9
Cyclic voltammograms of [2H]BF4 (left) and [3H]BF4 (right) with increasing equiv of CF3COOH (denoted on right). Overpotentials were estimated by the standard potential for hydrogen evolution from CF3COOH in MeCN solution. Conditions: ~0.5 mM in CH2Cl2 (see experimental), 0.1M [NBu4]PF6, scan rate 0.1 V/s, glassy carbon working electrode (d = 3.0 mm); Ag wire pseudoreference with internal Fc standard at 0 V; Pt counter electrode.
Figure 10
Figure 10
Cyclic voltammograms of a CH2Cl2 solution (0.74 mM) of [4H]BF4 with increasing equiv of CF3CO2H (denoted on right). Conditions: see Figure 9.
Figure 11
Figure 11
Influence of [acid]:catalyst ratio on catalytic current (ic/ip) for [1H]BF4 (black circles), [2H]BF4 (red squares), [3H]BF4 (blue triangles), and [4H]BF4 (green diamonds). Conditions: see Figure 9.
Scheme 1
Scheme 1
Proposed Ni-centered dynamics for 1 (L = CO) and 2 (L = P(OPh)3), 3 (L = PPh3), and 4 (L = PPh2py).
Scheme 2
Scheme 2
Representation of the Fe- and Ni-centered dynamic processes proposed for [2H]BF4. Variable temperature 13C NMR measurements indicate that pathway A has the lower barrier.
Scheme 3
Scheme 3
Catalytic cycle proposed for hydrogen evolution by [HNiFe(pdt)(dppe)L2(CO)]BF4.

References

    1. De Lacey AL, Fernández VM, Rousset M, Cammack R. Chem. Rev. 2007;107:4304–4330. - PubMed
    1. Ogata H, Lubitz W, Higuchi Y. Dalton Trans. 2009;7577:7587. - PubMed
    1. Fontecilla-Camps JC, Amara P, Cavazza C, Nicolet Y, Volbeda A. Nature. 2009;460:814–822. - PubMed
    1. Fontecilla-Camps JC, Volbeda A, Cavazza C, Nicolet Y. Chem. Rev. 2007;107:4273–4303. - PubMed
    1. Heinekey DM. J. Organometal. Chem. 2009;694:2671–2680.

Publication types