Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2010 Oct 7:10:293.
doi: 10.1186/1471-2334-10-293.

Rationale, design, and results of the first screening round of a comprehensive, register-based, Chlamydia screening implementation programme in the Netherlands

Affiliations

Rationale, design, and results of the first screening round of a comprehensive, register-based, Chlamydia screening implementation programme in the Netherlands

Jan E A M van Bergen et al. BMC Infect Dis. .

Abstract

Background: Implementing Chlamydia trachomatis screening in the Netherlands has been a point of debate for several years. The National Health Council advised against implementing nationwide screening until additional data collected from a pilot project in 2003 suggested that screening by risk profiles could be effective. A continuous increase in infections recorded in the national surveillance database affirmed the need for a more active approach. Here, we describe the rationale, design, and implementation of a Chlamydia screening demonstration programme.

Methods: A systematic, selective, internet-based Chlamydia screening programme started in April 2008. Letters are sent annually to all 16 to 29-year-old residents of Amsterdam, Rotterdam, and selected municipalities of South Limburg. The letters invite sexually active persons to login to http://www.chlamydiatest.nl with a personal code and to request a test kit. In the lower prevalence area of South Limburg, test kits can only be requested if the internet-based risk assessment exceeds a predefined value.

Results: We sent invitations to 261,025 people in the first round. One-fifth of the invitees requested a test kit, of whom 80% sent in a sample for testing. The overall positivity rate was 4.2%.

Conclusions: This programme advances Chlamydia control activities in the Netherlands. Insight into the feasibility, effectiveness, cost-effectiveness, and impact of this large-scale screening programme will determine whether the programme will be implemented nationally.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Operational flowchart of the Chlamydia screening programme.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Website of the Chlamydia screening programme.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Polymed plastic envelope and test materials.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Time between invitation and request of a testing kit.

References

    1. Peipert JF. Genital Chlamydia infections. N Engl J Med. 2003;349:2424–2430. doi: 10.1056/NEJMcp030542. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Land JA, van Bergen JEAM, Morre SA, Postma MJ. Epidemiology of Chlamydia trachomatis infection in women and the cost-effectiveness of screening. Human Reproduction Update. 2010;16:189–204. doi: 10.1093/humupd/dmp035. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Van Bergen JEAM, Götz HM, Richardus JH, Hoebe CJ, Broer J, Coenen AJ. Prevalence of urogenital Chlamydia trachomatis increases significantly with level of urbanisation and suggests targeted screening approaches: results from the first national population based study in the Netherlands. Sex Transm Infect. 2005;81:17–23. doi: 10.1136/sti.2004.010173. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Götz HM, van Bergen JE, Veldhuijzen IK, Broer J, Hoebe CJ, Steyerberg EW, Coenen AJ, de Groot F, Verhooren MJ, van Schaik DT. A prediction rule for selective screening of Chlamydia trachomatis infection. Sex Transm Infect. 2005;81:24–30. doi: 10.1136/sti.2004.010181. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Gezondheidsraad: Jaarbericht Gezondheidsonderzoek. Den Haag Gezondheidsraad Publicatie [The Hague Health Council Publication] 2006.