Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2010 Oct;85(1):129-143.
doi: 10.1007/s11192-010-0234-4. Epub 2010 May 6.

Characterizing a scientific elite: the social characteristics of the most highly cited scientists in environmental science and ecology

John N Parker, Christopher Lortie, Stefano Allesina

Characterizing a scientific elite: the social characteristics of the most highly cited scientists in environmental science and ecology

John N Parker et al. Scientometrics. 2010 Oct.

Abstract

In science, a relatively small pool of researchers garners a disproportionally large number of citations. Still, very little is known about the social characteristics of highly cited scientists. This is unfortunate as these researchers wield a disproportional impact on their fields, and the study of highly cited scientists can enhance our understanding of the conditions which foster highly cited work, the systematic social inequalities which exist in science, and scientific careers more generally. This study provides information on this understudied subject by examining the social characteristics and opinions of the 0.1% most cited environmental scientists and ecologists. Overall, the social characteristics of these researchers tend to reflect broader patterns of inequality in the global scientific community. However, while the social characteristics of these researchers mirror those of other scientific elites in important ways, they differ in others, revealing findings which are both novel and surprising, perhaps indicating multiple pathways to becoming highly cited.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Geographic distribution, demographic characteristics, and lifestyle choices
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Work habits and resources
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Research foci and experiences with peer review
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Experiences with peer review
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Aksnes DW. Citation rates and perceptions of scientific contribution. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 2006;57(2):169–185. doi: 10.1002/asi.20262. - DOI
    1. Basu A. Using ISI’s ‘Highly cited researchers’ to obtain a country level indicator of citation excellence. Scientometrics. 2006;68(3):361–375. doi: 10.1007/s11192-006-0117-x. - DOI
    1. Batty M. The geography of scientific citation. Environment and Planning A. 2003;35:761–765. doi: 10.1068/a3505com. - DOI
    1. Cole JR, Cole S. Social stratification in science. Chicago: University of Chicago Press; 1973.
    1. Cole JR, Zuckerman H. The productivity puzzle: Persistence and change in patterns of publication of men and women scientists. In: Steinkamp MW, Maehr ML, editors. Advances in motivation and achievement. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press; 1984. pp. 217–256.