Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 1990 Dec:11 Suppl I:49-61.
doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/11.suppl_i.49.

Doppler ultrasonic measurement of cardiac output: reproducibility and validation

Affiliations
Review

Doppler ultrasonic measurement of cardiac output: reproducibility and validation

A J Coats. Eur Heart J. 1990 Dec.

Abstract

The Doppler ultrasonic estimation of cardiac output in man is reviewed. Minimal requirements for accurate measurements are discussed, and the published results of reproducibility studies and validation studies are summarized and analysed. Analysis of Doppler records has a coefficient of repeat determination of 5-8% for aortic or LV outflow tract measurements and this is higher for other sites. Short-term variability varies from 4 to 10%, and that over days to weeks from 9 to 14%. Thus a single measurement may vary up to +/- 28% over time with no true change in cardiac output. For cardiac output determination, the Doppler methods show accuracies varying from 10 to 22% (coefficient of variation of the differences between methods) indicating that a single aortic based measurement only reliably lies within +/- 28% compared with other 'standard' methods, and during exercise the accuracy is less (+/- 44%). Doppler methods are safe, fairly reproducible and reasonably accurate methods for measuring cardiac output in selected patients provided signal quality is adequate during recording.

PubMed Disclaimer

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources