[Combined hormonal contraception in cycles artificially extended]
- PMID: 20931801
[Combined hormonal contraception in cycles artificially extended]
Abstract
Objective: To compare the bleeding patterns, satisfaction and tolerability of 3 different contraceptive in an extended regimens in the service of Family Planning of the North Central Hospital of PEMEX.
Material and methods: Healthy, adult women with desire of contraception for one year (N 120) were randomly assigned to receive oral contraceptive drospirenone/ethinyl E2 (group1), the norelgestromin/ethinyl E2 transdermal patch (group 2) and vaginal ring etonogestrel/ ethinyl E2 (group 3) in an extended regimen (42 consecutive days, 1 hormone-free week). Study assessments were conducted at scheduled visits at the time of initial screening, at baseline after 1, 3, 6, and 12 months. Subjects recorded menstrual associated symptoms bleeding data and completed satisfaction questionnaires. Subjects and investigators provided overall assessments of the regimens.
Results: Extended use of 3 different contraceptive resulted in fewer bleeding days in every group (66.6%, 55% and 58.3% P 0.0024), and less mastalgia and menstrual pain. Subjects were highly satisfied with three regimens (93.3%, 96.6% and 91.6% P 0.00421). Although not mayor adverse events were reported with this regimen, there was an increase in spotting days; it decreased with each successive cycle of therapy. Efficacy and safety were similar to those reported for traditional cycle.
Conclusion: Extended-contraceptive regimen delays menses and reduces bleeding, a profile that may be preferred by women who seek flexibility with their contraceptive method.
Similar articles
-
[Efficacy and safety of drospirenone-ethinylestradiol on contraception in healthy Chinese women: a multicenter randomized controlled trial].Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi. 2009 Jan;44(1):38-44. Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi. 2009. PMID: 19563061 Clinical Trial. Chinese.
-
Cycle control with triphasic norgestimate and ethinyl estradiol, a new oral contraceptive agent.Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand Suppl. 1992;156:22-6. doi: 10.3109/00016349209156511. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand Suppl. 1992. PMID: 1324553 Clinical Trial.
-
Cycle control with a 21-day compared with a 24-day oral contraceptive pill: a randomized controlled trial.Obstet Gynecol. 2009 Dec;114(6):1205-1212. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e3181beab47. Obstet Gynecol. 2009. PMID: 19935020 Clinical Trial.
-
[Individualization of low-dose oral contraceptives. Pharmacological principles and practical indications for oral contraceptives].Minerva Ginecol. 2007 Aug;59(4):415-25. Minerva Ginecol. 2007. PMID: 17923832 Review. Italian.
-
Efficacy and safety of a monophasic and a triphasic oral contraceptive containing norgestimate.Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1994 May;170(5 Pt 2):1556-61. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9378(94)05019-2. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1994. PMID: 8178906 Review.
Cited by
-
Skin patch and vaginal ring versus combined oral contraceptives for contraception.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013 Apr 30;2013(4):CD003552. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003552.pub4. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013. PMID: 23633314 Free PMC article.