Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2010 Apr-Jun;14(2):313-9.
doi: 10.4293/108680810X12785289145088.

Robot-assisted laparoscopic ureterolysis: case report and literature review of the minimally invasive surgical approach

Affiliations
Review

Robot-assisted laparoscopic ureterolysis: case report and literature review of the minimally invasive surgical approach

Stéfanie A Seixas-Mikelus et al. JSLS. 2010 Apr-Jun.

Abstract

Objectives: To evaluate our case of robot-assisted ureterolysis (RU), describe our surgical technique, and review the literature on minimally invasive ureterolysis.

Methods: One patient managed with robot-assisted ureterolysis for idiopathic retroperitoneal fibrosis was identified. The chart was analyzed for demographics, operative parameters, and immediate postoperative outcome. The surgical technique was assessed and modified. Lastly, a review of the published literature on ureterolysis managed with minimally invasive surgery was performed.

Results: One patient underwent robot-assisted ureterolysis at our institution in 2 separate settings. Operative time (OR) decreased from 279 minutes to 191 minutes. Estimated blood loss (EBL) was less than 50 mL. The patient has been free of symptoms and both renal units are unobstructed. According to the published literature, 302 renal units underwent successful laparoscopic ureterolysis (LU), and 6 renal units underwent RU. There were 9 open conversions (all in LU). Mean OR in LU was 248 minutes for unilateral and 386 minutes for bilateral cases. In RU, mean OR was 220 minutes for unilateral and 390 minutes for bilateral cases. EBL averaged 200 mL in LU and 30 mL in RU.

Conclusions: Our data reveal that robot-assisted ureterolysis is safe and feasible. Published data demonstrate the advantages of minimally invasive surgery.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Kavoussi LR, Clayman RV, Brunt LM, et al. Laparoscopic ureterolysis. J Urol. 1992;147:426–429 - PubMed
    1. Puppo P, Carmignani G, Gallucci M, et al. Bilateral laparoscopic ureterolysis. Eur Urol. 1994;25:82–84 - PubMed
    1. Matsuda T, Arai Y, Muguruma K, et al. Laparoscopic ureterolysis for idiopathic retroperitoneal fibrosis. Eur Urol. 1994;26:286–290 - PubMed
    1. Elashry OM, Nakada SY, Wolf JS, et al. Ureterolysis for extrinsic ureteral obstruction: a comparison of laparoscopic and open surgical techniques. J Urol. 1996;156:1403–1410 - PubMed
    1. Nezhat C, Nezhat F, Nezhat CH, et al. Urinary tract endometriosis treated by laparoscopy. Fertil Steril. 1996;66:920–924 - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources