Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Clinical Trial
. 2011 Jun 1;80(2):614-20.
doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2010.06.050. Epub 2010 Oct 6.

Parameters favorable to intraprostatic radiation dose escalation in men with localized prostate cancer

Affiliations
Clinical Trial

Parameters favorable to intraprostatic radiation dose escalation in men with localized prostate cancer

Nadine Housri et al. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. .

Abstract

Purpose: To identify , within the framework of a current Phase I trial, whether factors related to intraprostatic cancer lesions (IPLs) or individual patients predict the feasibility of high-dose intraprostatic irradiation.

Methods and materials: Endorectal coil MRI scans of the prostate from 42 men were evaluated for dominant IPLs. The IPLs, prostate, and critical normal tissues were contoured. Intensity-modulated radiotherapy plans were generated with the goal of delivering 75.6 Gy in 1.8-Gy fractions to the prostate, with IPLs receiving a simultaneous integrated boost of 3.6 Gy per fraction to a total dose of 151.2 Gy, 200% of the prescribed dose and the highest dose cohort in our trial. Rectal and bladder dose constraints were consistent with those outlined in current Radiation Therapy Oncology Group protocols.

Results: Dominant IPLs were identified in 24 patients (57.1%). Simultaneous integrated boosts (SIB) to 200% of the prescribed dose were achieved in 12 of the 24 patients without violating dose constraints. Both the distance between the IPL and rectum and the hip-to-hip patient width on planning CT scans were associated with the feasibility to plan an SIB (p = 0.002 and p = 0.0137, respectively).

Conclusions: On the basis of this small cohort, the distance between an intraprostatic lesion and the rectum most strongly predicted the ability to plan high-dose radiation to a dominant intraprostatic lesion. High-dose SIB planning seems possible for select intraprostatic lesions.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Endorectal coil MR image of the prostate gland. Arrow indicates the lesion suspicious for carcinoma.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Planning CT with contours of prostate, intraprostatic lesion, and rectum.
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
(a) Example of successful treatment plan. (b) Isodose line key.
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Categorization of patients into dose cohorts according to feasibility of dose escalation.

References

    1. Shao YH, Demissie K, Shih W, et al. Contemporary risk profile of prostate cancer in the United States. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2009;101:1280–1283. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Coen JJ, Zietman AL, Thakral H, et al. Radical radiation for localized prostate cancer: Local persistence of disease results in a late wave of metastases. J Clin Oncol. 2002;20:3199–3205. - PubMed
    1. Kuban DA, el-Mahdi AM, Schellhammer PF. Effect of local tumor control on distant metastasis and survival in prostatic adenocarcinoma. Urology. 1987;30:420–426. - PubMed
    1. Zelefsky MJ, Reuter VE, Fuks Z, et al. Influence of local tumor control on distant metastases and cancer related mortality after external beam radiotherapy for prostate cancer. J Urol. 2008;179:1368–1373. discussion 1373. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Pollack A, Zagars GK, Starkschall G, et al. Prostate cancer radiation dose response: Results of the M.D. Anderson phase III randomized trial. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2002;53:1097–1105. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms