Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2010 Dec 1;70(23):9875-85.
doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-10-1100. Epub 2010 Oct 8.

Blockade of the ubiquitin protease UBP43 destabilizes transcription factor PML/RARα and inhibits the growth of acute promyelocytic leukemia

Affiliations

Blockade of the ubiquitin protease UBP43 destabilizes transcription factor PML/RARα and inhibits the growth of acute promyelocytic leukemia

Yongli Guo et al. Cancer Res. .

Abstract

More effective treatments for acute promyelocytic leukemia (APL) are needed. APL cell treatment with all-trans-retinoic acid (RA) degrades the chimeric, dominant-negative-acting transcription factor promyelocytic leukemia gene (PML)/RARα, which is generated in APL by chromosomal translocation. The E1-like ubiquitin-activating enzyme (UBE1L) associates with interferon-stimulated gene ISG15 that binds and represses PML/RARα protein. Ubiquitin protease UBP43/USP18 removes ISG15 from conjugated proteins. In this study, we explored how RA regulates UBP43 expression and the effects of UBP43 on PML/RARα stability and APL growth, apoptosis, or differentiation. RA treatment induced UBE1L, ISG15, and UBP43 expression in RA-sensitive but not RA-resistant APL cells. Similar in vivo findings were obtained in a transgenic mouse model of transplantable APL, and in the RA response of leukemic cells harvested directly from APL patients. UBP43 knockdown repressed PML/RARα protein levels and inhibited RA-sensitive or RA-resistant cell growth by destabilizing the PML domain of PML/RARα. This inhibitory effect promoted apoptosis but did not affect the RA differentiation response in these APL cells. In contrast, elevation of UBP43 expression stabilized PML/RARα protein and inhibited apoptosis. Taken together, our findings define the ubiquitin protease UBP43 as a novel candidate drug target for APL treatment.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Disclosure of Potential Conflicts of Interest

No potential conflicts of interest exist.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
All-trans-retinoic acid (RA) regulation of UBE1L, ISG15, and UBP43 mRNA expression in RA-sensitive versus RA-resistant acute promyelocytic leukemia (APL) cells. (A) RA-sensitive NB4-S1 cells and RA-resistant NB4-R1 APL cells were each cultured with RA (1μM) or with vehicle for the indicated times in hours (h). UBE1L, ISG15, UBP43 and GAPDH mRNAs were each assessed by real-time RT-PCR assays. Similar results were obtained from three independent experiments. A representative result is shown. RA-treatment induced UBE1L and ISG15 before UBP43 expression in NB4-S1 cells, but these species were not induced in NB4-R1 APL cells. (B and C) Immunogenic peptides generated the indicated anti-UBP43 polyclonal antibodies (see Materials and Methods). UBP43 protein was detected in COS-7 cells transfected with pcDNA4-UBP43 (+), but not with an insertless control pcDNA4 vector (-). The 43-kDa UBP43 protein was detected using these respective antibodies. This protein was not detected when pre-immune antisera for each antibody was probed to each respective filter. Molecular weight size markers are displayed.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
UBP43 is expressed and active in APL cells. (A) ISG15-UBP43 conjugation was detected in NB4-S1 APL cells. Immunoprecipitation (IP) with an anti-HA antibody followed by immunoblotting (IB) with a second anti-HA antibody (left panel) or an anti-UBP43 antibody (middle panel) revealed ISG15-UBP43 complex formation in NB4-S1 APL cells pre-incubated with HA-ISG15-vinylmethyl ester (HA-ISG15-VME). Closed arrows depict positions of UBP43 conjugated with ISG15, the open arrow indicates unconjugated UBP43 protein, and the hatched arrow shows the position of HA-tagged ISG15. The absence of HA-tagged ISG15 detection in the first lane of the left panel of Fig. 2A is due to no HA-tagged ISG15 addition to this lysate. Other species detected in the left and middle panels likely represent non-specific signals. The right panel indicates that UBP43 can remove ISG15 from PML/RARα protein following anti-HA immunoprecipitation of HA-tagged PML/RARα protein followed by anti-HA or anti-ISG15 immunoblotting (IB) to detect PML/RARα. Molecular weight size markers are displayed. (B and C) Independent immunoblot expression for UBP43 in NB4-R1 and in NB4-S1 APL cells treated with RA (1μM) or vehicle (DMSO) for the indicated hours (h). No appreciable change in UBP43 expression occurred after RA-treatment of NB4-R1 APL cells, as shown in panel B. In contrast, UBP43 was induced after 48 hours of RA-treatment in NB4-S1 APL cells, as displayed in panel C. Quantifications of respective signals are presented.
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Effects of UBP43 transfection on PML/RARα protein stability. (A) Three different constructs, designated 1 through 3, assessed PML/RARα protein domain stabilities after engineered UBP43 over-expression. The EGFP expression vector served as a transfection control. Actin expression confirmed similar amounts of loaded proteins. Quantifications of these indicated immunoblot signals appear in the right panels. Full-length PML/RARα and the PML, but not RARα domains of PML/RARα were stabilized by UBP43. (B) Effects of UBP43 on transfected HA-tagged PML/RARα in BEAS-2B cells. Immunoblot expression for PML/RARα and actin is shown in the presence (+) or absence (−) of cycloheximide (CHX; 40μg/mL) treatment. UBP43 stabilized exogenous PML/RARα protein despite CHX-treatment, as detected by the anti-HA antibody. Quantification of signals is provided. (C and D) UBP43 knock-down in APL cells. (C) Transient transfection of two independent UBP43 targeting siRNAs versus an inactive control siRNA (see Materials and Methods) reduced UBP43 and decreased PML/RARα immunoblot expression in NB4-S1 cells, as in panel C. (D) UBP43 knock-down by each siRNA targeting UBP43 significantly (*, P < 0.01) induced apoptosis versus inactive control siRNA in panel D.
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
(A) Stable UBP43 knock-down by retroviral transduction of UBP43 shRNA in APL cells. UBP43 shRNA transduction (+) destabilized endogenous PML/RARα protein expression, as compared to an insertless retrovirus vector (−) independently in NB4-R1 (left panel) and NB4-S1 APL cells (right panel). Actin expression confirmed similar protein loading. (B) Retroviral-mediated knock-down of UBP43 triggered significant apoptosis in NB4-R1 (left panel) and NB4-S1 (right panel)APL cells. (C) Independent retroviral-mediated knock-down of UBP43 in NB4-R1 and NB4-S1 APL cells significantly inhibited proliferation as compared to an insertless retroviral vector. Significant changes are depicted (**, P < 0.005).
Fig. 5
Fig. 5
Gain of UBP43 expression in APL cells. (A) Independent UBP43 immunoblot analyses were performed in the indicated APL cell lines engineered after UBP43 (+) or an insertless (−) retroviral transduction. Increased UBP43 expression augmented PML/RARα expression in NB4-R1 (left panel) and NB4-S1 APL cells (right panel). Actin expression confirmed similar protein loading. (B) UBP43 retroviral transduction inhibited apoptosis in NB4-R1 and NB4-S1 cells versus insertless control transduction, as measured by these caspase 3/7 assays. (C) Engineered gain of UBP43 expression augmented proliferation of NB4-R1 and NB4-S1 APL cells versus insertless vector controls. Significant changes are depicted (**, P < 0.005).
Fig. 6
Fig. 6
RA-treatment of a murine transgenic transplantable APL model and of APL cells harvested directly from patients. (A) UBE1L, ISG15 and UBP43 mRNA expression profiles were each studied in RA-treated versus vehicle control-treated APL mice (see Materials and Methods). After RA-treatment for the indicated hours (h), UBE1L, ISG15 and UBP43 mRNAs were each increased in the isolated spleens. (B) RA-treatment induced UBE1L, ISG15 and UBP43 mRNA expression in cultured human APL cells from two representative RA-responsive cases, but not appreciably in a representative RA-resistant APL case. Expression profiles were studied after RA-treatment or no treatment and differentiation response was assessed by nitrotetrazolium blue (NBT) staining as described in the Materials and Methods. NBT positive cells appeared after RA-treatment of RA-responsive, but minimally in RA-resistant APL cells from these cases. Significant changes are indicated (**, P < 0.005).

References

    1. Larson RA, Kondo K, Vardiman JW, Butler AE, Golomb HM, Rowley JD. Evidence for a 15;17 translocation in every patient with acute promyelocytic leukemia. Am J Med. 1984;76:827–41. - PubMed
    1. de Thé H, Lavau C, Marchio A, Chomienne C, Degos L, Dejean A. The PML-RAR alpha fusion mRNA generated by the t(15;17) translocation in acute promyelocytic leukemia encodes a functionally altered RAR. Cell. 1991;66:675–84. - PubMed
    1. Kakizuka A, Miller WH, Jr, Umesono K, Warrell RP, Jr, Frankel SR, Murty VV, Dmitrovsky E, Evans RM. Chromosomal translocation t(15;17) in human acute promyelocytic leukemia fuses RAR alpha with a novel putative transcription factor, PML. Cell. 1991;66:663–74. - PubMed
    1. Pitha-Rowe I, Petty WJ, Kitareewan S, Dmitrovsky E. Retinoid target genes in acute promyelocytic leukemia. Leukemia. 2003;17:1723–30. - PubMed
    1. Freemantle SJ, Spinella MJ, Dmitrovsky E. Retinoids in cancer therapy and chemoprevention: promise meets resistance. Oncogene. 2003;22:7305–15. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

Substances