Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2010 Sep 1;12(5):312-318.
doi: 10.1097/NJH.0b013e3181ec9dd1.

Subject Recruitment and Retention against Quadruple Challenges in an Intervention Trial of End-of-Life Communication

Affiliations

Subject Recruitment and Retention against Quadruple Challenges in an Intervention Trial of End-of-Life Communication

Anne-Marie Shields et al. J Hosp Palliat Nurs. .

Abstract

Studies of end-of-life care face difficulties associated with enrollment and attrition. Information and exemplars can help end-of-life care researchers anticipate such difficulties and customize recruitment and retention strategies to achieve planned sample sizes. We analyzed data on recruitment and retention efforts used in a clinical trial of an end-of-life communication intervention that involved African American dialysis patients and their chosen surrogate decision makers. Despite the challenges the trial faced (e.g., recruiting a minority group of patients who were seriously ill, had a surrogate decision maker willing to join the study, and were willing to engage in end-of-life discussions), the planned sample size was met, and nearly 90% of the participants completed the study. Various strategies were used to sustain accrual during the study. Although a total of 16 contacts per dyad had been planned from enrollment to 3-months data collection, 27 contacts were actually needed. The strategies and procedures used in this study may be pertinent to other studies that involve African Americans with serious illness and require dyadic participation.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Steinhauser KE, Clipp EC, Hays JC, Olsen M, Arnold R, Christakis NA, Lindquist JH, Tulsky JA. Identifying, recruiting, and retaining seriously-ill patients and their caregivers in longitudinal research. Palliat Med. 2006;20:745–754. - PubMed
    1. Kirchhoff KT, Kehl KA. Recruiting Participants in End-of-Life Research. Am J Hosp Palliat Care. 2008;24:515–521. - PubMed
    1. McMillan SC, Weitzner MA. Methodologic issues in collecting data from debilitated patients with cancer near the end of life. Oncol Nurs Forum. 2003;30:123–129. - PubMed
    1. Northouse LL, Rosset T, Phillips L, Mood D, Schafenacker A, Kershaw T. Research with families facing cancer: the challenges of accrual and retention. Res Nurs Health. 2006;29:199–211. - PubMed
    1. Tennstedt SL. Commentary on “Research Design in End-of-Life Research: State of Science”. Gerontologist. 2002;42(Spec No 3):99–103. - PubMed