Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2011 Feb;30(2):279-81.
doi: 10.1007/s10096-010-1078-9. Epub 2010 Oct 10.

Predicting the pathogen of diabetic toe osteomyelitis by two consecutive ulcer cultures with bone contact

Affiliations
Free article
Comparative Study

Predicting the pathogen of diabetic toe osteomyelitis by two consecutive ulcer cultures with bone contact

L Bernard et al. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2011 Feb.
Free article

Abstract

In this study, we investigate the accuracy of two consecutive ulcer cultures with bone contact compared to bone biopsy for the diagnosis of diabetic toe osteomyelitis. The same nurse and orthopaedic surgeon obtained all samples: sample A-1: bone contact swabbing through the ulcer; sample A-2: a second culture swabbing from the bone surface within 24 h; sample B: surgical bone biopsy in the operating theatre. The kappa statistic measure between samples A-1 and A-2 (bone contact swabs) indicated 82.35% agreement. The sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values of the two samples A compared to B were 96%, 79%, 92% and 88%, respectively, for the causative pathogen. These results were similar with prior antibiotic treatment, discordant bone surface swabs or with monomicrobial infections. As a conclusion, two consecutive diabetic toe cultures with bone contact accurately predict the pathogen of diabetic toe osteomyelitis in 90% of cases.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Acta Orthop Belg. 2005 Apr;71(2):209-12 - PubMed
    1. Lancet. 2004 Jul 24-30;364(9431):369-79 - PubMed
    1. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2011 Feb;17(2):285-91 - PubMed
    1. Clin Infect Dis. 2006 Jan 1;42(1):57-62 - PubMed
    1. Int J Infect Dis. 2010 May;14(5):e390-3 - PubMed