Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2010 Oct 11:8:116.
doi: 10.1186/1477-7525-8-116.

Improving the interpretation of quality of life evidence in meta-analyses: the application of minimal important difference units

Affiliations
Review

Improving the interpretation of quality of life evidence in meta-analyses: the application of minimal important difference units

Bradley C Johnston et al. Health Qual Life Outcomes. .

Abstract

Systematic reviews of randomized trials that include measurements of health-related quality of life potentially provide critical information for patient and clinicians facing challenging health care decisions. When, as is most often the case, individual randomized trials use different measurement instruments for the same construct (such as physical or emotional function), authors typically report differences between intervention and control in standard deviation units (so-called "standardized mean difference" or "effect size"). This approach has statistical limitations (it is influenced by the heterogeneity of the population) and is non-intuitive for decision makers. We suggest an alternative approach: reporting results in minimal important difference units (the smallest difference patients experience as important). This approach provides a potential solution to both the statistical and interpretational problems of existing methods.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Pooled Estimate in SMD Units.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Pooled Estimate in MID Units.

References

    1. Angst F, Verra ML, Lehmann S, Aeschlimann A. Responsiveness of five condition-specific and generic outcome assessment instruments for chronic pain. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2008;8:26. doi: 10.1186/1471-2288-8-26. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Wiebe S, Guyatt GH, Weaver B, Matijevic S, Sidwell C. Comparative Responsiveness of Generic and Specific Quality of Life Instruments. J Clin Epidemiol. 2003;56:52–60. doi: 10.1016/S0895-4356(02)00537-1. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Patient Reported Outcomes and Quality of Life Instruments Database Accessed September 27, 2010. http://www.proqolid.org/proqolid/search__1/pathology_disease?pty=1924
    1. Higgins JPT, Green S, (editors) Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions Version 5.0.1 [updated September 2008]. The Cochrane Collaboration, 2008. http://www.cochrane-handbook.org
    1. Cohen J. Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences. second. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates; 1988. p. 25.

LinkOut - more resources