The pluralism problem in cross-border reproductive care
- PMID: 20940141
- DOI: 10.1093/humrep/deq270
The pluralism problem in cross-border reproductive care
Abstract
Outlawing well established forms of assisted reproduction places obstacles in the path of couples who wish to attain their reproductive goals with medical assistance. One effect of restrictive reproductive laws that has received widespread attention is cross-border reproductive travel. In Europe, such travel is permitted by the policy of free movement of persons that is a cornerstone of the democratic and economic stability of the European Union. Cross-border reproductive travel fails to promote moral and political pluralism in democratic states for three primary reasons. First, the opportunity for patients to go abroad for treatment tempers organized resistance to the law and allows government to pass stricter regulations than it otherwise might. Second, cross-border reproductive care has been shown to have deleterious extraterritorial effects that undermine the articulated rationales behind restrictive reproductive laws. Third, laws that generate demand for cross-border reproductive care often fail to satisfy the standard of proportionality that restrictions on human reproduction must meet.
Similar articles
-
Extraterritoriality for cross-border reproductive care: should states act against citizens travelling abroad for illegal infertility treatment?Reprod Biomed Online. 2011 Nov;23(5):546-54. doi: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2011.07.015. Epub 2011 Jul 27. Reprod Biomed Online. 2011. PMID: 21955486
-
Assisted reproduction on treacherous terrain: the legal hazards of cross-border reproductive travel.Reprod Biomed Online. 2011 Nov;23(5):538-45. doi: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2011.07.008. Epub 2011 Jul 23. Reprod Biomed Online. 2011. PMID: 21962773
-
Circumvention tourism.Cornell Law Rev. 2012 Sep;97(6):1309-98. Cornell Law Rev. 2012. PMID: 23072007
-
The global landscape of cross-border reproductive care: twenty key findings for the new millennium.Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 2012 Jun;24(3):158-63. doi: 10.1097/GCO.0b013e328352140a. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 2012. PMID: 22366965 Review.
-
Cross-border reproductive care for law evasion: should physicians be allowed to help infertility patients evade the law of their own country?Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2016 Jul;202:101-5. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2015.08.032. Epub 2015 Sep 2. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2016. PMID: 26372639 Review.
Cited by
-
The market for reproductive tourism: an analysis with special reference to Greece.Glob Health Res Policy. 2017 Jun 12;2:16. doi: 10.1186/s41256-017-0037-8. eCollection 2017. Glob Health Res Policy. 2017. PMID: 29202084 Free PMC article.
-
The multiple birth epidemic: revisited.J Obstet Gynaecol India. 2012 Aug;62(4):386-90. doi: 10.1007/s13224-012-0309-7. J Obstet Gynaecol India. 2012. PMID: 23904695 Free PMC article.
-
Unravelling orders in a borderless Europe? Cross-border reproductive care and the paradoxes of assisted reproductive technology policy in Germany and Poland.Reprod Biomed Soc Online. 2017 Apr 28;3:48-59. doi: 10.1016/j.rbms.2017.02.002. eCollection 2016 Dec. Reprod Biomed Soc Online. 2017. PMID: 29774250 Free PMC article.
-
Cross-border reproductive care among French patients: experiences in Greece, Spain and Belgium.Hum Reprod. 2013 Nov;28(11):3103-10. doi: 10.1093/humrep/det326. Epub 2013 Aug 13. Hum Reprod. 2013. PMID: 23943796 Free PMC article.
-
Attitudes toward Regulations of Reproductive Care in the European Union: A Comparison between Travellers for Cross-Border Reproductive Care and Citizens of the Local Country.Facts Views Vis Obgyn. 2016 Sep;8(3):147-160. Facts Views Vis Obgyn. 2016. PMID: 28003869 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical