Paediatric robotic-assisted laparoscopic augmentation ileocystoplasty and Mitrofanoff appendicovesicostomy (RALIMA): feasibility of and initial experience with the University of Chicago technique
- PMID: 20942829
- DOI: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2010.09706.x
Paediatric robotic-assisted laparoscopic augmentation ileocystoplasty and Mitrofanoff appendicovesicostomy (RALIMA): feasibility of and initial experience with the University of Chicago technique
Abstract
Objective: •To present the first series of complete intracorporeal robotic-assisted laparoscopic augmentation ileocystoplasty and Mitrofanoff appendico-vesicostomy (RALIMA) in a paediatric population.
Patients and methods: • From February to November 2008, six patients with neurogenic bladder secondary to spina bifida (status post corrective spine surgery) were selected to undergo RALIMA by a single surgeon (MSG) at the University of Chicago Medical Center. • Patients had constipation, day and night-time incontinence, with recurrent urinary tract infection (UTI), and failed attempts at anticholinergic therapy and clean intermittent catheterization. All had low-capacity bladders with poor compliance and high leak point pressures. • Preoperative bowel preparation was not performed. Mean follow-up is 18 months.
Results: • One patient required conversion to open ileal augmentation because of failure to progress and another underwent augmentation ileocystoplasty without appendico-vesicostomy. The average age of patients was 9.75 years (range 8-11 years). • Average operative time was 8.4 h (range 6-11 h). There were no intraoperative complications. One patient had a postoperative wound infection, one had a lower extremity venous thrombus, and another had temporary unilateral lower extremity paresthesia that has resolved. Three patients required revision of their stoma at the skin-level. • Perioperatively, patients only required oral analgesia for 24-36 h (excluding one patient with paralytic ileus), started on liquid diet after 7.5 hours (range 6-10 h), on regular diet after 24 h (range 12-36 h) and were discharged home within 7 days. • Postoperatively, patients demonstrated no leak on follow-up cystogram, and were catheterizing per apendico-vesicostomy (three patients by 6 weeks) or urethra (1 patient at 4 weeks). • All patients now have day and night-time continence with no UTIs, and bladder capacity of 250-450 mL.
Conclusion: • While longer follow-up will be necessary to see if these results are durable, this series demonstrates that RALIMA is a safe, feasible and effective procedure in the short term, with the possible added benefits of reduced analgesia, shorter recovery time and improved aesthetic appearance.
© 2010 THE AUTHORS. BJU INTERNATIONAL © 2010 BJU INTERNATIONAL.
Similar articles
-
Pediatric robotic-assisted laparoscopic augmentation ileocystoplasty and Mitrofanoff appendicovesicostomy: complete intracorporeal--initial case report.Urology. 2008 Nov;72(5):1144-7; discussion 1147. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2008.06.070. Epub 2008 Sep 19. Urology. 2008. PMID: 18804263
-
Continence outcomes in patients undergoing robotic assisted laparoscopic mitrofanoff appendicovesicostomy.J Urol. 2011 Apr;185(4):1438-43. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2010.11.050. Epub 2011 Feb 19. J Urol. 2011. PMID: 21334678
-
Robotic assisted laparoscopic Mitrofanoff appendicovesicostomy: preliminary experience in a pediatric population.J Urol. 2009 Oct;182(4):1528-34. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2009.06.055. Epub 2009 Aug 15. J Urol. 2009. PMID: 19683730
-
The robotic appendicovesicostomy and bladder augmentation: the next frontier in robotics, are we there?Urol Clin North Am. 2015 Feb;42(1):121-30. doi: 10.1016/j.ucl.2014.09.009. Epub 2014 Oct 12. Urol Clin North Am. 2015. PMID: 25455178 Review.
-
Bladder Reconstruction with Bowel: Robot-Assisted Laparoscopic Ileocystoplasty with Mitrofanoff Appendicovesicostomy in Pediatric Patients.J Endourol. 2018 May;32(S1):S119-S126. doi: 10.1089/end.2017.0720. J Endourol. 2018. PMID: 29774817 Review.
Cited by
-
Laparoscopic appendicovesicostomy and ileovesicostomy: A step-by-step technique description in neurogenic patients.Urol Ann. 2019 Oct-Dec;11(4):399-404. doi: 10.4103/UA.UA_167_18. Urol Ann. 2019. PMID: 31649461 Free PMC article.
-
Robot-assisted reconstructive surgery of lower urinary tract in children: a narrative review on technical aspects and current literature.Transl Pediatr. 2023 Aug 30;12(8):1540-1551. doi: 10.21037/tp-22-533. Epub 2023 Aug 17. Transl Pediatr. 2023. PMID: 37692545 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Surgical management of pediatric urinary incontinence.Curr Urol Rep. 2013 Aug;14(4):342-9. doi: 10.1007/s11934-013-0333-x. Curr Urol Rep. 2013. PMID: 23832825 Review.
-
Robotic-assisted laparoscopic reconstructive surgery in the lower urinary tract.Curr Urol Rep. 2013 Aug;14(4):333-41. doi: 10.1007/s11934-013-0328-7. Curr Urol Rep. 2013. PMID: 23740381 Review.
-
Mitrofanoff Appendicovesicostomy in Robotic Paediatric Surgery-A Systematic Review.Children (Basel). 2024 Nov 26;11(12):1442. doi: 10.3390/children11121442. Children (Basel). 2024. PMID: 39767871 Free PMC article. Review.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources