Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2011 May;56(5):1572-7.
doi: 10.1007/s10620-010-1438-4. Epub 2010 Oct 14.

The increase in balloon size to over 15 mm does not affect the development of pancreatitis after endoscopic papillary large balloon dilatation for bile duct stone removal

Affiliations

The increase in balloon size to over 15 mm does not affect the development of pancreatitis after endoscopic papillary large balloon dilatation for bile duct stone removal

Young Hoon Youn et al. Dig Dis Sci. 2011 May.

Abstract

Background: Endoscopic papillary large balloon dilatation (EPLBD) after endoscopic sphincterotomy (EST) has recently become widely used for common bile duct (CBD) stone removal, but many clinicians remain concerned about post-procedural pancreatitis with increasing the balloon size to over 15 mm.

Aims: We aimed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of EPLBD with a relatively large balloon (15-20 mm) after EST and to evaluate the factors related to post-EPLBD pancreatitis.

Methods: A retrospective review was undertaken of the endoscopic database of 101 patients with CBD stones who underwent EPLBD using a larger balloon size of over 15 mm (15-20 mm). Clinical parameters, endoscopic data, and outcomes were analyzed.

Results: The mean age of the subjects was 69 years. All patients had a dilated CBD of over 11 mm (mean = 22.6 mm). The mean size of balloon used in EPLBD was 17.1 ± 1.9 mm (range 15-20 mm). Mechanical lithotripsy was required in seven patients (6.9%). The rate of complete stone removal in the first session was 92.1%. Post-procedural pancreatitis developed in five cases (5.4%), but none were graded as severe. The smaller dilatation of the CBD, longer cannulation time, and longer time for stone removal were associated with post-procedural pancreatitis, but larger size of balloon did not affect the development of post-EPLBD pancreatitis.

Conclusions: EPLBD with a large balloon of over 15 mm with EST is an effective and safe procedure with a very low probability of severe post-procedural pancreatitis. Post-EPLBD pancreatitis was not associated with larger balloon size, but was associated with longer procedure time and smaller dilatation of the CBD.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1a–h
Fig. 1a–h
Endoscopic papillary large balloon dilatation (EPLBD) procedure. a Cholangiogram shows a large dilated common bile duct (CBD) and multiple bile duct stones. b Endoscopic sphincterotomy is performed. c, d Papillary dilation with a 20-mm large balloon. eg Large bile duct stones were removed without crushing, by balloon retrieval and Dormia basket. h Large biliary orifice after the procedure
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
The angle of the distal common bile duct (CBD) with the horizontal plane. The angle of the distal CBD was measured as the angle between the inflated balloon at the ampulla and the horizontal plane of the vertebra (black lines)

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Staritz M, Ewe K, Meyer zum Büschenfelde KH. Endoscopic papillary dilatation, a possible alternative to endoscopic papillotomy. Lancet. 1982;1:1306–1307. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(82)92873-2. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Sato H, Kodama T, Takaaki J, et al. Endoscopic papillary balloon dilatation may preserve sphincter of Oddi function after common bile duct stone management: evaluation from the viewpoint of endoscopic manometry. Gut. 1997;41:541–544. doi: 10.1136/gut.41.4.541. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Komatsu Y, Kawabe T, Toda N, et al. Endoscopic papillary balloon dilation for the management of common bile duct stones: experience of 226 cases. Endoscopy. 1998;30:12–17. doi: 10.1055/s-2007-993721. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Arnold JC, Benz C, Martin WR, et al. Endoscopic papillary balloon dilation vs. sphincterotomy for removal of common bile duct stones: a prospective randomized pilot study. Endoscopy. 2001;33:563–567. doi: 10.1055/s-2001-15307. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Vlavianos P, Chopra K, Mandalia S, et al. Endoscopic balloon dilatation versus endoscopic sphincterotomy for the removal of bile duct stones: a prospective randomised trial. Gut. 2003;52:1165–1169. doi: 10.1136/gut.52.8.1165. - DOI - PMC - PubMed