Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2010 Oct 7;5(10):e13266.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0013266.

Evaluation of a cervical cancer screening program based on HPV testing and LLETZ excision in a low resource setting

Margaret McAdam  1 , Jerol Sakita, Len Tarivonda, James Pang, Ian H Frazer
Affiliations

Evaluation of a cervical cancer screening program based on HPV testing and LLETZ excision in a low resource setting

Margaret McAdam et al. PLoS One. .

Abstract

We conducted studies in Vanuatu to evaluate potential screening and treatment strategies to assist with control of cervical cancer. In a pilot study of 496 women, visual inspection and cytology were evaluated as screening tests for detection of CIN 2 or worse (CIN2+), observed in 21 of 206 subjects biopsied on the basis of abnormal visual inspection or cytology. Sensitivity of visual inspection with Lugol's Iodine for detection of CIN2+ on biopsy was 0.63, specificity was 0.32, and the positive predictive value was 0.09. For HSIL cytology, sensitivity was 0.99, specificity was 0.77, and the positive predictive value was 0.88. HSIL cytology was significantly more sensitive and had a significantly higher PPV for CIN 2+ than visual inspection (p<0.01). In a further study of 514 women, we compared testing for HR HPV and cytology as predictors of biopsy proven CIN 2+. Sensitivity of HSIL cytology for CIN2+ as established by loop excision of the cervix was 0.81, specificity was 0.94, and positive predictive value was 0.48. Sensitivity of a positive test for HR HPV for detection of CIN2+ was non-significantly different from cytology at 0.81, specificity was 0.94, and positive predictive value was 0.42. Combining the two tests gave a significantly lower sensitivity of 0.63, a specificity of 0.98, and a positive predictive value of 0.68. For women over 30 in a low resource setting without access to cytology, a single locally conducted test for high risk HPV with effective intervention could reduce cervical cancer risk as effectively as intervention based on cytology conducted in an accredited laboratory.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. Flow charts for subject recruitment and investigation.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Smith RA, Cokkinides V, Brawley OW. Cancer screening in the United States, 2009: a review of current American Cancer Society guidelines and issues in cancer screening. CA Cancer J Clin. 2009;59:27–41. 59/1/27 [pii];10.3322/caac.20008 [doi] - PubMed
    1. Grce M. Primary and secondary prevention of cervical cancer. Expert Rev Mol Diagn. 2009;9:851–857. 10.1586/erm.09.64 [doi] - PubMed
    1. Cervical cancer control in developing countries: memorandum from a WHO meeting. Bull World Health Organ. 1996;74:345–351. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Sankaranarayanan R, Wesley R, Thara S, Dhakad N, Chandralekha B, et al. Test characteristics of visual inspection with 4% acetic acid (VIA) and Lugol's iodine (VILI) in cervical cancer screening in Kerala, India. Int J Cancer. 2003;106:404–408. 10.1002/ijc.11245 [doi] - PubMed
    1. Shastri SS, Dinshaw K, Amin G, Goswami S, Patil S, et al. Concurrent evaluation of visual, cytological and HPV testing as screening methods for the early detection of cervical neoplasia in Mumbai, India. Bull World Health Organ. 2005;83:186–194. S0042-96862005000300011 [pii];/S0042-96862005000300011 [doi] - PMC - PubMed

Publication types