Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2010 Sep 24:4:159.
doi: 10.3389/fnbeh.2010.00159. eCollection 2010.

Innate recognition of pheromone and food odors in moths: a common mechanism in the antennal lobe?

Affiliations

Innate recognition of pheromone and food odors in moths: a common mechanism in the antennal lobe?

Joshua P Martin et al. Front Behav Neurosci. .

Abstract

The survival of an animal often depends on an innate response to a particular sensory stimulus. For an adult male moth, two categories of odors are innately attractive: pheromone released by conspecific females, and the floral scents of certain, often co-evolved, plants. These odors consist of multiple volatiles in characteristic mixtures. Here, we review evidence that both categories of odors are processed as sensory objects, and we suggest a mechanism in the primary olfactory center, the antennal lobe (AL), that encodes the configuration of these mixtures and may underlie recognition of innately attractive odors. In the pheromone system, mixtures of two or three volatiles elicit upwind flight. Peripheral changes are associated with behavioral changes in speciation, and suggest the existence of a pattern recognition mechanism for pheromone mixtures in the AL. Moths are similarly innately attracted to certain floral scents. Though floral scents consist of multiple volatiles that activate a broad array of receptor neurons, only a smaller subset, numerically comparable to pheromone mixtures, is necessary and sufficient to elicit behavior. Both pheromone and floral scent mixtures that produce attraction to the odor source elicit synchronous action potentials in particular populations of output (projection) neurons (PNs) in the AL. We propose a model in which the synchronous output of a population of PNs encodes the configuration of an innately attractive mixture, and thus comprises an innate mechanism for releasing odor-tracking behavior. The particular example of olfaction in moths may inform the general question of how sensory objects trigger innate responses.

Keywords: floral scent; moths; neuroethology; olfaction; pheromone; sensory coding; sensory object; synchrony.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Processing of innately attractive odor mixtures in the sex-pheromonal (A–D) and plant-odor (E–H) subsystems of the moth's antennal lobe. (A) Sex pheromones of moths typically comprise a “major” component (black circles) and one or more “minor” components (gray and light gray circles). (B) Pheromonal ORCs respond specifically to one of the components of the pheromone (colors corresponding to component colors in A). (C) Pheromonal ORCs synapse in glomeruli (large ovals). Glomeruli are connected by LNs (blue arrows) that mediate reciprocal inhibition. The output of PNs in each glomerulus (gray and black lines with superimposed spike rasters) in response to the pheromone includes a high proportion of synchronized spikes (red rasters). (D) Trains of synchronous spikes comprise the mixture-specific output of the MGC. (E) Plant odors typically include a large number of volatiles (colored circles), of which only a few may be necessary to elicit behavior. (F) Multiple ORCs respond to plant volatiles to varying degrees (colors represent specificity to correspondingly colored component from E, saturation of color represents sensitivity). (G) Stimulation with an innately attractive odor produces a pattern of synchrony (black lines) across the AL. (H) The mixture-specific output of the main AL is characterized by a pattern of synchronized firing of PNs from across the AL.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Ache B. W., Young J. M. (2005). Olfaction: diverse species, conserved principles. Neuron 48, 417–43010.1016/j.neuron.2005.10.022 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Angioy A. M., Desogus A., Barbarossa I. T., Anderson P., Hansson B. S. (2003). Extreme sensitivity in an olfactory system. Chem. Senses 28, 279–28410.1093/chemse/28.4.279 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Anglade P., Stockel J. (1984). Intraspecific sex pheromone variability in the European corn borer, Ostrinia nubilalis Hbn. (Lepidoptea, Pyralidae). Agronomie 4, 183–18710.1051/agro:19840209 - DOI
    1. Anton S., Homberg U. (1999). “Antennal lobe structure,” in Insect Olfaction, ed.Hansson B. S.(Heidelberg: Springer; ), 98–125
    1. Asahina K., Louis M., Piccinotti S., Vosshall L. B. (2009). A circuit supporting concentration-invariant odor perception in Drosophila. J. Biol. 8, 9.10.1186/jbiol108 - DOI - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources