Inter-relationships among behavioral markers, genes, brain and treatment in dyslexia and dysgraphia
- PMID: 20953351
- PMCID: PMC2953808
- DOI: 10.2217/fnl.10.22
Inter-relationships among behavioral markers, genes, brain and treatment in dyslexia and dysgraphia
Abstract
Cross-country, longitudinal twin studies provide strong evidence for both the biological and environmental basis of dyslexia, and the stability of genetic influences on reading and spelling, even when skills improve in response to instruction. Although DNA studies aimed at identifying gene candidates in dyslexia and related phenotypes (behavioral expression of underlying genotypes); and imaging studies of brain differences between individuals with and without dyslexia and the brain's response to instructional treatment are increasing, this review illustrates, with the findings of one multidisciplinary research center, an emerging trend to investigate the inter-relationships among genetic, brain and instructional treatment findings in the same sample, which are interpreted in reference to a working-memory architecture, for dyslexia (impaired decoding and spelling) and/or dysgraphia (impaired handwriting). General principles for diagnosis and treatment, based on research with children who failed to respond to the regular instructional program, are summarized for children meeting research criteria for having or being at risk for dyslexia or dysgraphia. Research documenting earlier emerging specific oral language impairment during preschool years associated with reading and writing disabilities during school years is also reviewed. Recent seminal advances and projected future trends are discussed for linking brain endophenotypes and gene candidates, identifying transchromosomal interactions, and exploring epigenetics (chemic al modifications of gene expression in response to developmental or environmental changes). Rather than providing final answers, this review highlights past, current and emerging issues in dyslexia research and practice.
Figures
Similar articles
-
Differential Diagnosis of Dysgraphia, Dyslexia, and OWL LD: Behavioral and Neuroimaging Evidence.Read Writ. 2015 Oct;28(8):1119-1153. doi: 10.1007/s11145-015-9565-0. Read Writ. 2015. PMID: 26336330 Free PMC article.
-
Changes in DTI Diffusivity and fMRI Connectivity Cluster Coefficients for Students with and without Specific Learning Disabilities In Written Language: Brain's Response to Writing Instruction.J Nat Sci. 2017 Apr;3(4):e350. J Nat Sci. 2017. PMID: 28670621 Free PMC article.
-
Sequential Prediction of Literacy Achievement for Specific Learning Disabilities Contrasting in Impaired Levels of Language in Grades 4 to 9.J Learn Disabil. 2018 Mar/Apr;51(2):137-157. doi: 10.1177/0022219417691048. Epub 2017 Feb 15. J Learn Disabil. 2018. PMID: 28199175 Free PMC article.
-
A multidisciplinary approach to understanding developmental dyslexia within working-memory architecture: genotypes, phenotypes, brain, and instruction.Dev Neuropsychol. 2008;33(6):707-44. doi: 10.1080/87565640802418662. Dev Neuropsychol. 2008. PMID: 19005912 Review.
-
Why Children With Dyslexia Struggle With Writing and How to Help Them.Lang Speech Hear Serv Sch. 2018 Oct 24;49(4):843-863. doi: 10.1044/2018_LSHSS-DYSLC-18-0024. Lang Speech Hear Serv Sch. 2018. PMID: 30458545 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Differences between Children with Dyslexia Who Are and Are Not Gifted in Verbal Reasoning.Gift Child Q. 2013 Oct;57(4):10.1177/0016986213500342. doi: 10.1177/0016986213500342. Gift Child Q. 2013. PMID: 24249873 Free PMC article.
-
Movement Issues Identified in Movement ABC2 Checklist Parent Ratings for Students with Persisting Dysgraphia, Dyslexia, and OWL LD and Typical Literacy Learners.Learn Disabil (Pittsbg). 2018;23(1):10-23. doi: 10.18666/LDMJ-2018-V23-I1-8449. Learn Disabil (Pittsbg). 2018. PMID: 29606845 Free PMC article.
-
Emotional and Behavioral Correlates of Persisting Specific Learning Disabilities in Written Language during Middle Childhood and Early Adolescence.J Psychoeduc Assess. 2018 Oct;36(7):651-669. doi: 10.1177/0734282917698056. Epub 2017 Mar 27. J Psychoeduc Assess. 2018. PMID: 30555207 Free PMC article.
-
Self-government of complex reading and writing brains informed by cingulo-opercular network for adaptive control and working memory components for language learning.J Syst Integr Neurosci. 2017;3:10.15761/JSIN.1000173. doi: 10.15761/JSIN.1000173. Epub 2017 Jul 31. J Syst Integr Neurosci. 2017. PMID: 29576874 Free PMC article.
-
A low-cost, computer-interfaced drawing pad for FMRI studies of dysgraphia and dyslexia.Sensors (Basel). 2013 Apr 17;13(4):5099-108. doi: 10.3390/s130405099. Sensors (Basel). 2013. PMID: 23595203 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Olson R, Byrne B, Samuelson S. Reconciling strong genetic and strong environmental influences on individual differences and deficits in reading ability. In: Pugh K, McCardle P, editors. How Children Learn to Read: Current Issues and New Directions in the Integration of Cognition Neurobiology, and Genetics of Reading and Dyslexia Research and Practice. Erlbaum/Taylor Francis Hillsdale; NJ, USA: 2009.
-
- Plomin R, Bergeman C. The nature or nurture: genetic influence on ‘environmental’ measure. Behavior Brain Sci. 1991;14:373–427.
-
- Lyytinen H, Aro M, Elklund K, et al. The development of children at familial risk for dyslexia: birth to early school age. Ann. Dyslexia. 2004;54:184–220. - PubMed
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Miscellaneous