Comparable Renal Function at 6 Months with Tacrolimus Combined with Fixed-Dose Sirolimus or MMF: Results of a Randomized Multicenter Trial in Renal Transplantation
- PMID: 20953372
- PMCID: PMC2952911
- DOI: 10.1155/2010/731426
Comparable Renal Function at 6 Months with Tacrolimus Combined with Fixed-Dose Sirolimus or MMF: Results of a Randomized Multicenter Trial in Renal Transplantation
Abstract
In a multicenter trial, renal transplant recipients were randomized to tacrolimus with fixed-dose sirolimus (Tac/SRL, N = 318) or tacrolimus with MMF (Tac/MMF, N = 316). Targeted tacrolimus trough levels were lower in the Tac/SRL group after day 14. The primary endpoint was renal function at 6 months using creatinine clearance (Cockcroft-Gault) and was comparable at 66.4 mL/min (SE 1.4) with Tac/SRL and at 65.2mL/min (SE 1.3) with Tac/MMF (completers). Biopsy-confirmed acute rejection was 15.1% (Tac/SRL) and 12.3% (Tac/MMF). In both groups, graft survival was 93% and patient survival was 99.0%. Premature withdrawal due to an adverse event was twice as high in the Tac/SRL group, 15.1% versus 6.3%. Hypercholesterolemia incidence was higher with Tac/SRL (P < .05) while CMV, leukopenia, and diarrhea incidences were higher with Tac/MMF (P < .05). The incidence of any antidiabetic treatment for >30 consecutive days in previously nondiabetic patients was 17.8%, Tac/SRL, and 24.8%, Tac/MMF. Evaluation at 6 months showed comparable renal function using tacrolimus/sirolimus and tacrolimus/MMF regimens.
Figures



Similar articles
-
De novo low-dose sirolimus versus mycophenolate mofetil in combination with extended-release tacrolimus in kidney transplant recipients: a multicentre, open-label, randomized, controlled, non-inferiority trial.Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2017 Aug 1;32(8):1415-1424. doi: 10.1093/ndt/gfx093. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2017. PMID: 28810721 Clinical Trial.
-
Comparison of four different immunosuppression protocols without long-term steroid therapy in kidney recipients monitored by surveillance biopsy: five-year outcomes.Transpl Immunol. 2008 Nov;20(1-2):32-42. doi: 10.1016/j.trim.2008.08.005. Epub 2008 Sep 4. Transpl Immunol. 2008. PMID: 18773960 Clinical Trial.
-
Comparison of steroid avoidance in tacrolimus/mycophenolate mofetil and tacrolimus/sirolimus combination in kidney transplantation monitored by surveillance biopsy.Transplantation. 2005 Sep 27;80(6):807-14. doi: 10.1097/01.tp.0000173378.28790.0b. Transplantation. 2005. PMID: 16210969 Clinical Trial.
-
Tacrolimus with mycophenolate mofetil or sirolimus compared with calcineurin inhibitor-free immunosuppression (sirolimus/mycophenolate mofetil) after heart transplantation: 5-year results.J Heart Lung Transplant. 2013 Mar;32(3):277-84. doi: 10.1016/j.healun.2012.11.028. J Heart Lung Transplant. 2013. PMID: 23415313 Clinical Trial.
-
Focus on mTOR inhibitors and tacrolimus in renal transplantation: pharmacokinetics, exposure-response relationships, and clinical outcomes.Transpl Immunol. 2014 Jun;31(1):22-32. doi: 10.1016/j.trim.2014.05.002. Epub 2014 May 24. Transpl Immunol. 2014. PMID: 24861504 Review.
Cited by
-
Long-term kidney allograft function and survival in prednisone-free regimens: tacrolimus/mycophenolate mofetil versus tacrolimus/sirolimus.Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2012 Mar;7(3):504-12. doi: 10.2215/CJN.06940711. Epub 2012 Jan 26. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2012. PMID: 22282478 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
mTOR inhibitor versus mycophenolic acid as the primary immunosuppression regime combined with calcineurin inhibitor for kidney transplant recipients: a meta-analysis.BMC Nephrol. 2015 Jul 1;16:91. doi: 10.1186/s12882-015-0078-5. BMC Nephrol. 2015. PMID: 26126806 Free PMC article.
-
Early conversion to a CNI-free immunosuppression with SRL after renal transplantation-Long-term follow-up of a multicenter trial.PLoS One. 2020 Aug 5;15(8):e0234396. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0234396. eCollection 2020. PLoS One. 2020. PMID: 32756556 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Target of rapamycin inhibitors (TOR-I; sirolimus and everolimus) for primary immunosuppression in kidney transplant recipients.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019 Dec 16;12(12):CD004290. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004290.pub3. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019. PMID: 31840244 Free PMC article.
-
Effect of Sirolimus vs. Everolimus on CMV-Infections after Kidney Transplantation-A Network Meta-Analysis.J Clin Med. 2022 Jul 20;11(14):4216. doi: 10.3390/jcm11144216. J Clin Med. 2022. PMID: 35887977 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Baboolal K, Jones GA, Janezic A, Griffiths DR, Jurewicz WA. Molecular and structural consequences of early renal allograft injury. Kidney International. 2002;61(2):686–696. - PubMed
-
- Nankivell BJ, Borrows RJ, Fung CL-S, O’Connell PJ, Allen RDM, Chapman JR. The natural history of chronic allograft nephropathy. New England Journal of Medicine. 2003;349(24):2326–2333. - PubMed
-
- First MR, Fitzsimmons WE. New drugs to improve transplant outcomes. Transplantation. 2004;77(9):S88–S92. - PubMed
-
- Kaufman DB, Shapiro R, Lucey MR, Cherikh WS, Bustami RT, Dyke DB. Immunosuppression: practice and trends. American Journal of Transplantation. 2004;4(supplement 9):38–53. - PubMed
-
- Vitko S, Wlodarczyk Z, Kyllönen L, et al. Tacrolimus combined with two different dosages of sirolimus in kidney transplantation: results of a multicenter study. American Journal of Transplantation. 2006;6(3):531–538. - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Miscellaneous