Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2011:2011:801940.
doi: 10.1155/2011/801940. Epub 2010 Sep 2.

Biological Evaluation of Polyherbal Ayurvedic Cardiotonic Preparation "Mahamrutyunjaya rasa"

Affiliations

Biological Evaluation of Polyherbal Ayurvedic Cardiotonic Preparation "Mahamrutyunjaya rasa"

Pallavi D Rai et al. Evid Based Complement Alternat Med. 2011.

Abstract

Mahamrutyunjaya rasa (MHR), an Ayurvedic formulation, used as cardiotonic, contains potentially toxic compounds like aconitine, which are detoxified during preparation using traditional methods. Comparative toxicological evaluation of laboratory prepared formulation (F1) and two marketed formulations (F2 and F3) were performed based on their effects on viability of H9c2 cells and after single oral dose administration in mice. Cardioprotective effect of formulations at 25 and 50 mg/kg doses were studied in isoproterenol- (ISO-) induced myocardial infarcted rats. F1 and F2 did not affect the cell viability, while F3 decreased the cell viability in concentration and time-dependent manner. Rats administered with ISO showed significant increase in the serum levels of glutamate oxaloacetate transaminase, alkaline phosphotase, creatinine kinase isoenzymes, lactate dehydrogenase, and uric acid, while F1 and F2 treatment showed significant reduction in the same. F3 showed further increase in the serum levels of enzymes and uric acid in ISO-challenged rats. High pressure liquid chromatographic analysis of formulations showed higher concentration of aconitine in F3. Study shows that F1 and F2 possess cardioprotective property with higher safety, while formulation F3 cannot be used as cardioprotective due to its cytotoxic effects. Thus, proper quality assessment methods are required during preparation of traditional formulations.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Microscopic images of mice heart, kidney, and liver illustrating effect of single oral dose administration of formulation F1, F2, and F3 (Staining: Hematoxylin and Eosin). Microscopic images of mice heart from (a) F1, (b) F2, (c) F3 groups; images of mice kidney from (d) F1, (e) F2, and (f) F3 images of mice liver from (g) F1, (h) F2, and (i) F3 groups. Solid arrow indicates the normal; and unfilled arrow indicates the affected/infracted/injured area of kidney/heart//liver.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Effect of formulations F1 (a), F2 (b), and F3 (c) on viability of H9c2 cells after 12, 24, and 48 h of treatment. Values are expressed as mean ± SD and are average of three determinations.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Effect of Formulations on serum levels of (a) CK-MB, (b) LDH, (c) GOT, (d) ALKP, and (e) Uric acid. Group I (1% solution of tween 80 in water followed by normal saline (2 mL/kg, s.c. twice at an interval of 24 h)); Group II (1% tween 80 followed by ISO (25 mg/kg, s.c. twice at an interval of 24 h)); Group III, VI, IX: (50 mg/kg dose of F1, F2, and F3, resp., followed by normal saline (2 mL/kg, s.c. twice at an interval of 24 h)); Group IV, VII, X: (administered orally with 25 mg/kg dose of F1, F2, and F3, respectively, followed by ISO (25 mg/kg, s.c. twice at an interval of 24 h)); Group V, VIII, XI (administered orally with 50 mg/kg dose of F1, F2, and F3, resp., followed by ISO (25 mg/kg, s.c. twice at an interval of 24 h)). #Compared with ISO treated group, *Compared with saline treated (control) group.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Effect of formulations F1, F2, and F3 (a) 25 mg/kg and (b) 50 mg/kg on Heart weight/body weight ratio (HW/BW). Group I (1% solution of tween 80 in water followed by normal saline (2 mL/kg, s.c. twice at an interval of 24 h)); Group II (1% tween 80 followed by ISO (25 mg/kg, s.c. twice at an interval of 24 h)); Group III, VI, IX: (50 mg/kg dose of F1, F2, and F3, resp., followed by normal saline (2 mL/kg, s.c. twice at an interval of 24 h)); Group IV, VII, X: (administered orally with 25 mg/kg dose of F1, F2, and F3, resp., followed by ISO (25 mg/kg, s.c. twice at an interval of 24 h)); Group V, VIII, XI (administered orally with 50 mg/kg dose of F1, F2, and F3, resp., followed by ISO (25 mg/kg, s.c. twice at an interval of 24 h)). *Compared with control group.
Figure 5
Figure 5
Microscopic images of rat heart illustrating the effect of formulation F1, F2, and F3 in ISO-induced MI rats (Staining: Haematoxylin and Eosin). Microscopic images of rat heart from Group I (a), Group II (b), Group III (c), Group IV (d), Group V (e), Group VI (f), Group VII (g), Group VIII (h), Group IX (i), Group X (j), Group XI (k).
Figure 6
Figure 6
Representative chromatogram of formulations F1 (prepared in laboratory), F2 (Baidyanath), and F3 (Pune Rasashala). Retention time of Aconitine ~8.2 mins. (Aconitine content (μgg−1) in F1-1.06, F2-1.27, and F3-5.10.).
Figure 7
Figure 7
Schematic Representation of the study performed for the biological evaluation of Mahamrutyunjaya rasa.

Similar articles

Cited by

  • Metallic preparations of Ayurveda: A boon to the ailing humanity.
    Ruknuddin G. Ruknuddin G. Indian J Nephrol. 2014 Sep;24(5):332-3. doi: 10.4103/0971-4065.133044. Indian J Nephrol. 2014. PMID: 25249731 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
  • Ṯābit Ibn Qurrah's contributions to toxicology.
    Amrollahi-Sharifabadi M, Musavi SEG, Gholamifard A, Qoronfleh MW, Fawzy MMM, Mohammed SG. Amrollahi-Sharifabadi M, et al. Naunyn Schmiedebergs Arch Pharmacol. 2025 Jan;398(1):379-392. doi: 10.1007/s00210-024-03374-3. Epub 2024 Aug 23. Naunyn Schmiedebergs Arch Pharmacol. 2025. PMID: 39177788 Review.

References

    1. Narayana D, Katayar C, Brindavanam N. Original system: search, research or re-search. IDMA Bulletin. 1998;29:413–416.
    1. Capasso R, Izzo AA, Pinto L, Bifulco T, Vitobello C, Mascolo N. Phytotherapy and quality of herbal medicines. Fitoterapia. 2000;71(1):S58–S65. - PubMed
    1. Mukherjee PK, Wahile A. Integrated approaches towards drug development from Ayurveda and other Indian system of medicines. Journal of Ethnopharmacology. 2006;103(1):25–35. - PubMed
    1. Patwardhan B, Warude D, Pushpangadan P, Bhatt N. Ayurveda and traditional Chinese medicine: a comparative overview. Evidence-Based Complementary and Alternative Medicine. 2005;2(4):465–473. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Sharma P. Caraka Samhita. Varanasi, India: Chaukhambha Orientalia; 1985.

LinkOut - more resources