Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2011 Aug;35(8):1165-9.
doi: 10.1007/s00264-010-1137-y. Epub 2010 Oct 16.

Pulsed lavage improves fixation strength of cemented tibial components

Affiliations

Pulsed lavage improves fixation strength of cemented tibial components

Ulf J Schlegel et al. Int Orthop. 2011 Aug.

Abstract

Pulsatile lavage is purported to improve radiographic survival in cemented total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Similarly, a potential improvement of fixation strength of the tibial tray has been assumed based on the increased cement penetration. In this study, the influence of pulsed lavage on fixation strength of the tibial component and bone cement penetration was evaluated in six pairs of cadaveric specimens. Following surgical preparation, the tibial surface was irrigated using pulsatile lavage on one side of a pair, while on the other side syringe lavage was applied. All tibial components were implanted using the same cementing technique. Cement penetration and bone mineral density was assessed based on computed tomography data. Fixation strength of the tibial trays was determined by a pull-out test with a material testing machine. Median pull-out forces and cement penetration were significantly (p = 0.031) improved in the pulsed lavage group as compared to the syringe lavage group. Enhanced fixation strength is suggested as being a key to improved survival of the implant. Consequently, pulsatile lavage should be considered as a mandatory preparation step when cementing tibial components in TKA.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Set-up for mechanical testing (adapter detached from material testing machine)
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Cement penetration depths (left) and pull-out forces (right) for the six tibial pairs
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Characteristic failure pattern for one specimen pair: syringe lavage (left), pulsed lavage (right)
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Left: 3D reconstruction of bone and cement mantle. Right: Anterior-posterior projection of the cement penetration depth (mm)

References

    1. Askew MJ, Steege JW, Lewis JL, Ranieri JR, Wixson RL. Effect of cement pressure and bone strength on polymethylmethacrylate fixation. J Orthop Res. 1984;1:412–420. doi: 10.1002/jor.1100010410. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Breusch SJ, Norman TL, Schneider U, Reitzel T, Blaha JD, Lukoschek M. Lavage technique in total hip arthroplasty: jet lavage produces better cement penetration than syringe lavage in the proximal femur. J Arthroplasty. 2000;15:921–927. doi: 10.1054/arth.2000.8098. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Clarius M, Hauck C, Seeger JB, James A, Murray DW, Aldinger PR. Pulsed lavage reduces the incidence of radiolucent lines under the tibial tray of Oxford unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: pulsed lavage versus syringe lavage. Int Orthop. 2009;33:1585–1590. doi: 10.1007/s00264-009-0736-y. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Dalury DF, Pomeroy DL, Gonzales RA, Gruen TA, Adams MJ, Empson JA. Midterm results of all-polyethylene tibial components in primary total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2009;24:620–624. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2008.03.004. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Davies JP, Harris WH. Tensile bonding strength of the cement-prosthesis interface. Orthopedics. 1994;17:171–173. - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources