Neoadjuvant treatment for resectable pancreatic cancer: time for phase III testing?
- PMID: 20954273
- PMCID: PMC2957595
- DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v16.i39.4883
Neoadjuvant treatment for resectable pancreatic cancer: time for phase III testing?
Abstract
This paper discusses the rationale for phase III testing of neoadjuvant therapy in patients affected by resectable pancreatic adenocarcinoma. The therapeutic management of patients affected by resectable pancreatic cancer is particularly troublesome due to the aggressiveness of the disease and to the limited efficacy and sometimes unfavourable risk-benefit ratio of the available therapeutic tools. Conflicting data on the role of adjuvant chemoradiation have been reported, while adjuvant single-agent chemotherapy significantly improved overall survival (OS) when compared to surgery alone. However, the OS figures for adjuvant chemotherapy remain disappointing. In effect, pancreatic cancer exhibits a prominent tendency to recur after a brief median time interval from surgery and extra-pancreatic dissemination represents the predominant pattern of disease failure. Neoadjuvant treatment has a strong rationale in this disease but limited information on the efficacy of this approach is available from single arm trials with low levels of evidence. Thus, in spite of two decades of investigation there is currently no evidence to support the routine use of pre-surgical therapy in clinical practice. To foster knowledge on the optimal management of this disease, and to produce evidence-based treatment guidelines, there is no alternative to well designed randomized trials. Systemic chemotherapy is a candidate for testing because it is supported by a more robust rationale than chemoradiation. Combination chemotherapy regimens with elevated activity in advanced disease warrant investigation. Caution would suggest the running of an exploratory phase II randomized trial before embarking on a large phase III study.
Similar articles
-
Surgery and multimodal treatments in pancreatic cancer--a review on the basis of future multimodal treatment concepts.Gan To Kagaku Ryoho. 1999 Jan;26(1):10-40. Gan To Kagaku Ryoho. 1999. PMID: 9987495 Review.
-
Neoadjuvant therapy for resectable pancreatic cancer.Surg Oncol Clin N Am. 2004 Oct;13(4):639-61, ix. doi: 10.1016/j.soc.2004.06.007. Surg Oncol Clin N Am. 2004. PMID: 15350939 Review.
-
Characterization of Anthropometric Changes that Occur During Neoadjuvant Therapy for Potentially Resectable Pancreatic Cancer.Ann Surg Oncol. 2015 Jul;22(7):2416-23. doi: 10.1245/s10434-014-4285-2. Epub 2014 Dec 18. Ann Surg Oncol. 2015. PMID: 25519927 Free PMC article.
-
The cost-effectiveness of neoadjuvant chemoradiation is superior to a surgery-first approach in the treatment of pancreatic head adenocarcinoma.Ann Surg Oncol. 2013 Dec;20 Suppl 3:S500-8. doi: 10.1245/s10434-013-2882-0. Epub 2013 Feb 10. Ann Surg Oncol. 2013. PMID: 23397153
-
Resection and radiochemotherapy of pancreatic cancer--the future?Langenbecks Arch Surg. 1998 Apr;383(2):134-44. doi: 10.1007/pl00008075. Langenbecks Arch Surg. 1998. PMID: 9641886 Review.
Cited by
-
Pancreatic cancer biomarkers and their implication in cancer diagnosis and epidemiology.Cancers (Basel). 2010 Nov 2;2(4):1830-7. doi: 10.3390/cancers2041830. Cancers (Basel). 2010. PMID: 24281203 Free PMC article.
-
The Role of Endoscopic Ultrasonography in the Diagnosis and Staging of Pancreatic Cancer.Cancers (Basel). 2022 Mar 8;14(6):1373. doi: 10.3390/cancers14061373. Cancers (Basel). 2022. PMID: 35326524 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Clinical and pathological features of five-year survivors after pancreatectomy for pancreatic adenocarcinoma.World J Surg Oncol. 2014 Nov 27;12:360. doi: 10.1186/1477-7819-12-360. World J Surg Oncol. 2014. PMID: 25429841 Free PMC article.
-
Neoadjuvant therapy in pancreatic adenocarcinoma: a meta-analysis of phase II trials.Surgery. 2011 Sep;150(3):466-73. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2011.07.006. Surgery. 2011. PMID: 21878232 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Neoadjuvant radiation followed by resection versus upfront resection for locally advanced pancreatic cancer patients: a propensity score matched analysis.Oncotarget. 2017 Jul 18;8(29):47831-47840. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.18091. Oncotarget. 2017. PMID: 28599299 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Kalser MH, Ellenberg SS. Pancreatic cancer. Adjuvant combined radiation and chemotherapy following curative resection. Arch Surg. 1985;120:899–903. - PubMed
-
- Neoptolemos JP, Stocken DD, Friess H, Bassi C, Dunn JA, Hickey H, Beger H, Fernandez-Cruz L, Dervenis C, Lacaine F, et al. A randomized trial of chemoradiotherapy and chemotherapy after resection of pancreatic cancer. N Engl J Med. 2004;350:1200–1210. - PubMed
-
- Klinkenbijl JH, Jeekel J, Sahmoud T, van Pel R, Couvreur ML, Veenhof CH, Arnaud JP, Gonzalez DG, de Wit LT, Hennipman A, et al. Adjuvant radiotherapy and 5-fluorouracil after curative resection of cancer of the pancreas and periampullary region: phase III trial of the EORTC gastrointestinal tract cancer cooperative group. Ann Surg. 1999;230:776–782; discussion 782-784. - PMC - PubMed
-
- Oettle H, Post S, Neuhaus P, Gellert K, Langrehr J, Ridwelski K, Schramm H, Fahlke J, Zuelke C, Burkart C, et al. Adjuvant chemotherapy with gemcitabine vs observation in patients undergoing curative-intent resection of pancreatic cancer: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA. 2007;297:267–277. - PubMed
-
- Neoptolemos J, Büchler M, Stocken DD, Ghaneh P, Smith D, Bassi C, Moore M, Cunningham D, Dervenis C, Goldstein D. ESPAC-3(v2): A multicenter, international, open-label, randomized, controlled phase III trial of adjuvant 5-fluorouracil/folinic acid (5-FU/FA) versus gemcitabine (GEM) in patients with resected pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. J Clin Oncol. 2009;27:A4505.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical