How people see others is different from how people see themselves: a replicable pattern across cultures
- PMID: 20954788
- DOI: 10.1037/a0020963
How people see others is different from how people see themselves: a replicable pattern across cultures
Abstract
Consensus studies from 4 cultures--in Belgium, the Czech Republic, Estonia, and Germany--as well as secondary analyses of self- and observer-reported Revised NEO Personality Inventory (NEO PI-R) data from 29 cultures suggest that there is a cross-culturally replicable pattern of difference between internal and external perspectives for the Big Five personality traits. People see themselves as more neurotic and open to experience compared to how they are seen by other people. External observers generally hold a higher opinion of an individual's conscientiousness than he or she does about him- or herself. As a rule, people think that they have more positive emotions and excitement seeking but much less assertiveness than it seems from the vantage point of an external observer. This cross-culturally replicable disparity between internal and external perspectives was not consistent with predictions based on the actor-observer hypothesis because the size of the disparity was unrelated to the visibility of personality traits. A relatively strong negative correlation (r = -.53) between the average self-minus-observer profile and social desirability ratings suggests that people in most studied cultures view themselves less favorably than they are perceived by others.
Similar articles
-
Meta-insight: do people really know how others see them?J Pers Soc Psychol. 2011 Oct;101(4):831-46. doi: 10.1037/a0024297. J Pers Soc Psychol. 2011. PMID: 21688920
-
A study of affective temperaments in Hungary: internal consistency and concurrent validity of the TEMPS-A against the TCI and NEO-PI-R.J Affect Disord. 2008 Feb;106(1-2):45-53. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2007.03.016. Epub 2007 Aug 15. J Affect Disord. 2008. PMID: 17706791
-
Personality: the universal and the culturally specific.Annu Rev Psychol. 2009;60:369-94. doi: 10.1146/annurev.psych.60.110707.163655. Annu Rev Psychol. 2009. PMID: 19035827 Review.
-
Asymmetry in judgments of personality: others are less differentiated than the self.J Pers. 2008 Jun;76(3):535-60. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-6494.2008.00495.x. Epub 2008 Apr 8. J Pers. 2008. PMID: 18399954
-
Gender differences in personality traits across cultures: robust and surprising findings.J Pers Soc Psychol. 2001 Aug;81(2):322-331. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.81.2.322. J Pers Soc Psychol. 2001. PMID: 11519935 Review.
Cited by
-
Network structures and temporal stability of self- and informant-rated affective symptoms in Alzheimer's disease.J Affect Disord. 2020 Nov 1;276:1084-1092. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2020.07.100. Epub 2020 Jul 19. J Affect Disord. 2020. PMID: 32771860 Free PMC article.
-
How are personality trait and profile agreement related?Front Psychol. 2015 Jun 9;6:785. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00785. eCollection 2015. Front Psychol. 2015. PMID: 26106356 Free PMC article.
-
Drunk personality: reports from drinkers and knowledgeable informants.Exp Clin Psychopharmacol. 2014 Jun;22(3):187-97. doi: 10.1037/a0036607. Epub 2014 May 5. Exp Clin Psychopharmacol. 2014. PMID: 24796850 Free PMC article.
-
Eating Behaviours, Oral Hygiene, and Caries in a Population of Spanish Children with Divorced Parents: A Cross-Sectional Study.J Clin Med. 2023 Sep 25;12(19):6189. doi: 10.3390/jcm12196189. J Clin Med. 2023. PMID: 37834833 Free PMC article.
-
Conceptual and methodological issues in the study of the personality-and-culture relationship.Front Psychol. 2023 Mar 28;14:1077851. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1077851. eCollection 2023. Front Psychol. 2023. PMID: 37057156 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Research Materials
Miscellaneous