Auriculotherapy for pain management: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
- PMID: 20954963
- PMCID: PMC3110838
- DOI: 10.1089/acm.2009.0451
Auriculotherapy for pain management: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
Abstract
Objectives: Side-effects of standard pain medications can limit their use. Therefore, nonpharmacologic pain relief techniques such as auriculotherapy may play an important role in pain management. Our aim was to conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis of studies evaluating auriculotherapy for pain management.
Design: MEDLINE,(®) ISI Web of Science, CINAHL, AMED, and Cochrane Library were searched through December 2008. Randomized trials comparing auriculotherapy to sham, placebo, or standard-of-care control were included that measured outcomes of pain or medication use and were published in English. Two (2) reviewers independently assessed trial eligibility, quality, and abstracted data to a standardized form. Standardized mean differences (SMD) were calculated for studies using a pain score or analgesic requirement as a primary outcome.
Results: Seventeen (17) studies met inclusion criteria (8 perioperative, 4 acute, and 5 chronic pain). Auriculotherapy was superior to controls for studies evaluating pain intensity (SMD, 1.56 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.85, 2.26]; 8 studies). For perioperative pain, auriculotherapy reduced analgesic use (SMD, 0.54 [95% CI: 0.30, 0.77]; 5 studies). For acute pain and chronic pain, auriculotherapy reduced pain intensity (SMD for acute pain, 1.35 [95% CI: 0.08, 2.64], 2 studies; SMD for chronic pain, 1.84 [95% CI: 0.60, 3.07], 5 studies). Removal of poor quality studies did not alter the conclusions. Significant heterogeneity existed among studies of acute and chronic pain, but not perioperative pain.
Conclusions: Auriculotherapy may be effective for the treatment of a variety of types of pain, especially postoperative pain. However, a more accurate estimate of the effect will require further large, well-designed trials.
Figures
References
-
- Health, United States, National Center for Health Statistics Report. National Center for Health Statistics Report. National Center for Health Statistics Report. www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/hus/hus07.pdf. [Jul 17;2008 ]. www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/hus/hus07.pdf
-
- Max MB. How to move pain and symptom research from the margin to the mainstream. J Pain. 2003;4:355–360. - PubMed
-
- National Cancer Control Programmes: Policies and Managerial Guidelines. Genera, Switzerland: World Health Organization; 2002.
-
- Kalso E. Edwards JE. Moore RA. McQuay HJ. Opioids in chronic non-cancer pain: Systematic review of efficacy and safety. Pain. 2004;112:372–380. - PubMed
-
- Wolfe MM. Lichtenstein DR. Singh G. Gastrointestinal toxicity of nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs. NEJM. 1999;340:1888–1899. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous
