Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2010 Mar;19(115):24-9.
doi: 10.1183/09059180.00007809.

Exercise training and pulmonary rehabilitation: new insights and remaining challenges

Affiliations
Review

Exercise training and pulmonary rehabilitation: new insights and remaining challenges

T Troosters et al. Eur Respir Rev. 2010 Mar.

Abstract

Pulmonary rehabilitation is now regarded as an evidence-based treatment for symptomatic patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. It has been shown to enhance exercise tolerance, improve symptoms and health-related quality of life, and reduce exacerbations in patients with recurrent exacerbations. In this article we review the mechanisms through which exercise training results in beneficial effects. We also review three challenges that currently remain: 1) the fine tuning of exercise training and multidisciplinary programmes; 2) the timing of rehabilitation; and 3) efforts to enhance the accessibility and adherence to pulmonary rehabilitation programmes. Further research is needed in order to apply the now well-established principles of pulmonary rehabilitation to unusual patient populations, or patient populations that are unlikely to participate in conventional outpatient programmes.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

FIGURE 1.
FIGURE 1.
Mechanism through which pulmonary rehabilitation and pharmacotherapy may enhance physical activity. VE: minute ventilation; VO2: maximal oxygen uptake.
FIGURE 2.
FIGURE 2.
Improvement of physical activity. ▪: studies that were statistically significant; ▓: studies that were statistically nonsignificant. S: standard; I: individualised; C: classic; CP: classic+pedometer feedback; 3M: 3 months; 6M: 6 months.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Nici L, Donner C, Wouters E. American Thoracic Society/European Respiratory Society statement on pulmonary rehabilitation. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2006; 173: 1390–1413. - PubMed
    1. Salhi B, Troosters T, Behaegel M. Effects of pulmonary rehabilitation in patients with restrictive lung diseases. Chest 2009; [Epub ahead of print DOI: 10.1378/chest.09-0241]. - PubMed
    1. Holland AE, McDonald CF. Pulmonary rehabilitation and interstitial lung disease. Thorax 2009; 64: 548 - PubMed
    1. de Man FS, Handoko ML, Groepenhoff H. Effects of exercise training in patients with idiopathic pulmonary arterial hypertension. Eur Respir J 2009; 34: 669–675. - PubMed
    1. Munro PE, Holland AE, Bailey M. Pulmonary rehabilitation following lung transplantation. Transplant Proc 2009; 41: 292–295. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms