Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2010 Nov;126(5):865-71.
doi: 10.1542/peds.2010-0744. Epub 2010 Oct 18.

Costs and consequences of universal sibling screening for vesicoureteral reflux: decision analysis

Affiliations

Costs and consequences of universal sibling screening for vesicoureteral reflux: decision analysis

Jonathan C Routh et al. Pediatrics. 2010 Nov.

Abstract

Objective: Our objective was to evaluate screening for vesicoureteral reflux (VUR) among siblings of patients with VUR, in terms of cost, radiation exposure, and number of febrile urinary tract infections (fUTIs) averted.

Methods: We constructed a Markov model to evaluate 2 competing management options, that is, universal screening (cystographic evaluation of all siblings without symptoms) and usual care (cystographic evaluation of siblings only after fUTIs). Published data were used to inform all model inputs. Costs were estimated by using a societal perspective.

Results: Universal screening yielded 2980 fUTIs, whereas usual care yielded 6330. Therefore, universal screening for VUR in a cohort of 100,000 siblings 1 year of age without symptoms resulted in the prevention of 1 initial fUTI per 3360 siblings, at an excess cost of $55,600 per averted fUTI, in comparison with usual care. These estimates were heavily dependent on screening age and the effectiveness of antibiotic prophylaxis; prevention of a single fUTI would require screening of 166 siblings 5 years of age and 694 siblings 10 years of age. Similarly, if prophylaxis was ineffective in preventing fUTIs, then up to 10,000 siblings would need to be screened for prevention of a single fUTI.

Conclusions: Prevention of a single fUTI would require screening of 30 to 430 siblings 1 year of age without symptoms, at an estimated excess cost of $56,000 to $820,000 per averted fUTI. These estimates are heavily dependent on screening age and the effectiveness of antibiotic prophylaxis.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1
Numbers of averted fUTIs according to age at screening and effectiveness of prophylaxis.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Briggs CE, Guo C-Y, Schoettler C, et al. Agenome scan in affected sib-pairs with familial vesicoureteral reflux identifies a locus on chromosome 5. Eur J Hum Genet. 2010;18(2):245–250. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Skoog SJ, Peters CA, Arant BS, et al. Pediatric Vesicoureteral Reflux Guidelines Panel summary report: clinical practice guidelines for screening siblings of children with vesicoureteral reflux and neonates/infants with prenatal hydronephrosis. J Urol. 2010;184(3):1145–1151. - PubMed
    1. Ferrer FA, McKenna PH, Hochman HI, Herndon A. Results of a vesicoureteral reflux practice pattern survey among American Academy of Pediatrics, Sectionon Pediatric Urology members. J Urol. 1998;160(3):1031–1037. - PubMed
    1. Bonnin F, Lottmann H, Sauty L, et al. Scintigraphic screening for renal damage in siblings of children with symptomatic primary vesicoureteric reflux. BJU Int. 2001;87(6):463–466. - PubMed
    1. Connolly LP, Treves ST, Zurakowski D, Bauer SB. Natural history of vesicoureteral reflux in siblings. J Urol. 1996;156(5):1805–1807. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

Substances