Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2010;2010(41):113-6.
doi: 10.1093/jncimonographs/lgq024.

Ductal carcinoma in situ: risk factors and impact of screening

Affiliations
Review

Ductal carcinoma in situ: risk factors and impact of screening

Beth A Virnig et al. J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr. 2010.

Abstract

Background: The National Institutes of Health Office of Medical Applications of Research commissioned a structured literature review on the incidence of ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) as a background paper for the State of the Science Conference on Diagnosis and Management of DCIS.

Methods: Published studies were abstracted from MEDLINE and other sources. We include articles published through January 31, 2009; 92 publications were abstracted.

Results: DCIS incidence rose from 1.87 per 100,000 in 1973-1975 to 32.5 per 100,000 in 2005. Increases in incidence were greatest in tumors without comedo necrosis. Incidence increased in all ages but more in women older than 50 years. Increased use of mammography explains some but not all of the increased incidence. Risk factors for incident DCIS include older age and positive family history. Whereas tamoxifen prevents both invasive breast cancer and DCIS, raloxifene is associated with decreased invasive breast cancer but not decreased DCIS.

Conclusions: Scientific questions deserving further investigation include the relationship between mammography use and DCIS incidence and the role of chemoprevention for reducing the incidence of DCIS and invasive breast cancer.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Trends in age-adjusted comedo and non-comedo DCIS and invasive breast cancer per 100 000 women (1,2).
Figure 2
Figure 2
Incidence of DCIS and invasive breast cancer by age (2002–2006) (1).

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Ries LaG, Melbert D, Krapcho M, et al. SEER Cancer Statistics Review, 1975–2005. Bethesda, MD: National Cancer Institute; 2008. http://seer.cancer.gov/csr/1975_2005/Accessed March 28, 2010.
    1. Li CI, Daling JR, Malone KE. Age-specific incidence rates of in situ breast carcinomas by histologic type, 1980 to 2001. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2005;14(4):1008–1011. - PubMed
    1. Innos K, Horn-Ross PL. Recent trends and racial/ethnic differences in the incidence and treatment of ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast in California women. Cancer. 2003;97(4):1099–1106. - PubMed
    1. Wohlfahrt J, Rank F, Kroman N, et al. A comparison of reproductive risk factors for CIS lesions and invasive breast cancer. Int J Cancer. 2004;108(5):750–753. - PubMed
    1. Kerlikowske K, Barclay J, Grady D, et al. Comparison of risk factors for ductal carcinoma in situ and invasive breast cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1997;89(1):76–82. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms