Outcomes for implementation research: conceptual distinctions, measurement challenges, and research agenda
- PMID: 20957426
- PMCID: PMC3068522
- DOI: 10.1007/s10488-010-0319-7
Outcomes for implementation research: conceptual distinctions, measurement challenges, and research agenda
Abstract
An unresolved issue in the field of implementation research is how to conceptualize and evaluate successful implementation. This paper advances the concept of "implementation outcomes" distinct from service system and clinical treatment outcomes. This paper proposes a heuristic, working "taxonomy" of eight conceptually distinct implementation outcomes-acceptability, adoption, appropriateness, feasibility, fidelity, implementation cost, penetration, and sustainability-along with their nominal definitions. We propose a two-pronged agenda for research on implementation outcomes. Conceptualizing and measuring implementation outcomes will advance understanding of implementation processes, enhance efficiency in implementation research, and pave the way for studies of the comparative effectiveness of implementation strategies.
Figures
References
-
- Bates DM, Sarkar D. lme4: Linear mixed-effects models using S4 classes. R Package Version. 2007;0:99875–99876.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
