Detection of elevated plasma levels of epidermal growth factor receptor before breast cancer diagnosis among hormone therapy users
- PMID: 20959476
- PMCID: PMC2970770
- DOI: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-10-1676
Detection of elevated plasma levels of epidermal growth factor receptor before breast cancer diagnosis among hormone therapy users
Abstract
Applying advanced proteomic technologies to prospectively collected specimens from large studies is one means of identifying preclinical changes in plasma proteins that are potentially relevant to the early detection of diseases such as breast cancer. We conducted 14 independent quantitative proteomics experiments comparing pooled plasma samples collected from 420 estrogen receptor-positive (ER(+)) breast cancer patients ≤17 months before their diagnosis and matched controls. Based on the more than 3.4 million tandem mass spectra collected in the discovery set, 503 proteins were quantified, of which 57 differentiated cases from controls with a P value of <0.1. Seven of these proteins, for which quantitative ELISA assays were available, were assessed in an independent validation set. Of these candidates, epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) was validated as a predictor of breast cancer risk in an independent set of preclinical plasma samples for women overall [odds ratio (OR), 1.44; P = 0.0008] and particularly for current users of estrogen plus progestin (E + P) menopausal hormone therapy (OR, 2.49; P = 0.0001). Among current E + P users, the EGFR sensitivity for breast cancer risk was 31% with 90% specificity. Whereas the sensitivity and specificity of EGFR are insufficient for a clinically useful early detection biomarker, this study suggests that proteins that are elevated preclinically in women who go on to develop breast cancer can be discovered and validated using current proteomic technologies. Further studies are warranted to examine the role of EGFR and to discover and validate other proteins that could potentially be used for early detection of breast cancer.
©2010 AACR.
Figures


References
-
- Kerlikowske K, Grady D, Rubin SM, Sandrock C, Ernster VL. Efficacy of screening mammography. A meta-analysis. Jama. 1995;273:149–54. - PubMed
-
- Jemal A, Siegel R, Ward E, Hao Y, Xu J, Thun MJ. Cancer statistics, 2009. CA Cancer J Clin. 2009;59:225–49. - PubMed
-
- Hortobagyi GN, de la Garza Salazar J, Pritchard K, Amadori D, Haidinger R, Hudis CA, et al. The global breast cancer burden: variations in epidemiology and survival. Clin Breast Cancer. 2005;6:391–401. - PubMed
-
- Hays J, Hunt JR, Hubbell FA, Anderson GL, Limacher M, Allen C, et al. The Women's Health Initiative recruitment methods and results. Ann Epidemiol. 2003;13:S18–77. - PubMed
-
- The Women's Health Initiative Study Group Design of the Women's Health Initiative clinical trial and observational study. The Women's Health Initiative Study Group. Control Clin Trials. 1998;19:61–109. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Grants and funding
- N01WH42129-32/WH/WHI NIH HHS/United States
- N01WH32100-2/WH/WHI NIH HHS/United States
- N01 WH022110/WH/WHI NIH HHS/United States
- N01WH42107-26/WH/WHI NIH HHS/United States
- N01WH32122/WH/WHI NIH HHS/United States
- N01WH32105-6/WH/WHI NIH HHS/United States
- N01WH32111-13/WH/WHI NIH HHS/United States
- N01WH32118-32119/WH/WHI NIH HHS/United States
- N01WH24152/WH/WHI NIH HHS/United States
- N01WH32108-9/WH/WHI NIH HHS/United States
- R01 CA097271/CA/NCI NIH HHS/United States
- N01WH32115/WH/WHI NIH HHS/United States
- N01WH44221/WH/WHI NIH HHS/United States
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources